Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] x86/xen: remove 32-bit Xen PV guest support

[Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>]

On 15.07.19 17:44, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/Makefile b/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
> > index 084de77a109e..d42737f31304 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
> > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> >   # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > -OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD_xen-asm_$(BITS).o := y
> > +OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD_xen-asm_64.o := y
> >   
> >   ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
> >   # Do not profile debug and lowlevel utilities
> > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_PV)          += mmu_pv.o
> >   obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_PV)          += irq.o
> >   obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_PV)          += multicalls.o
> >   obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_PV)          += xen-asm.o
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_PV)           += xen-asm_$(BITS).o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_PV)           += xen-asm_64.o
> We should be able to merge xen-asm_64.S into xen-asm.S, shouldn't we?
Yes, probably a good idea to add that.

> > @@ -1312,15 +1290,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init xen_start_kernel(void)
> >   
> >   	/* keep using Xen gdt for now; no urgent need to change it */
> >   
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> > -       pv_info.kernel_rpl = 1;
> > -       if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_supervisor_mode_kernel))
> > -               pv_info.kernel_rpl = 0;
> > -#else
> >         pv_info.kernel_rpl = 0;
> Is kernel_rpl needed anymore?
Yes, this can be dropped, together with get_kernel_rpl().


Juergen

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel