[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 07/13] x86/IRQ: target online CPUs when binding guest IRQ
fixup_irqs() skips interrupts without action. Hence such interrupts can retain affinity to just offline CPUs. With "noirqbalance" in effect, pirq_guest_bind() so far would have left them alone, resulting in a non- working interrupt. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> --- v3: New. --- I've not observed this problem in practice - the change is just the result of code inspection after having noticed action-less IRQs in 'i' debug key output pointing at all parked/offline CPUs. --- a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c @@ -1703,9 +1703,27 @@ int pirq_guest_bind(struct vcpu *v, stru desc->status |= IRQ_GUEST; - /* Attempt to bind the interrupt target to the correct CPU. */ - if ( !opt_noirqbalance && (desc->handler->set_affinity != NULL) ) - desc->handler->set_affinity(desc, cpumask_of(v->processor)); + /* + * Attempt to bind the interrupt target to the correct (or at least + * some online) CPU. + */ + if ( desc->handler->set_affinity ) + { + const cpumask_t *affinity = NULL; + + if ( !opt_noirqbalance ) + affinity = cpumask_of(v->processor); + else if ( !cpumask_intersects(desc->affinity, &cpu_online_map) ) + { + cpumask_setall(desc->affinity); + affinity = &cpumask_all; + } + else if ( !cpumask_intersects(desc->arch.cpu_mask, + &cpu_online_map) ) + affinity = desc->affinity; + if ( affinity ) + desc->handler->set_affinity(desc, affinity); + } desc->status &= ~IRQ_DISABLED; desc->handler->startup(desc); _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |