[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] iommu / x86: move call to scan_pci_devices() out of vendor code
> -----Original Message----- > From: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: 15 July 2019 15:39 > To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Suravee Suthikulpanit > <suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>; Brian Woods > <brian.woods@xxxxxxx>; Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>; Jan Beulich > <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>; Andrew > Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>; Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] iommu / x86: move call to scan_pci_devices() out > of vendor code > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 01:37:07PM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote: > > It's not vendor specific so it doesn't really belong there. > > > > Scanning the PCI topology also really doesn't have much to do with IOMMU > > initialization. It doesn't depend on there even being an IOMMU. This patch > > moves to the call to the beginning of iommu_hardware_setup() but only > > places it there because the topology information would be otherwise unused. > > > > Subsequent patches will actually make use of the PCI topology during > > (x86) IOMMU initialization. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> > Thanks. > I would even consider moving the call to scan_pci_devices into > pci_segments_init instead of doing it in the IOMMU code, as you > suggest above. Possibly, although without an IOMMU in the system I don't think there is currently a lot of point in populating the pdev list. Paul > > Thanks, Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |