|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/4] pci: add all-device iterator function...
On 16/07/2019 11:16, Paul Durrant wrote:
> ...and use it for setup_hwdom_pci_devices() and dump_pci_devices().
>
> The unlock/process-pending-softirqs/lock sequence that was in
> _setup_hwdom_pci_devices() is now done in the generic iterator function,
> which does mean it is also done (unnecessarily) in the case of
> dump_pci_devices(), since run_all_nonirq_keyhandlers() will call
> process_pending_softirqs() before invoking each key handler anyway, but
> this is not performance critical code.
>
> The "==== segment XXXX ====" headline that was in _dump_pci_devices() has
> been dropped because it is non-trivial to deal with it when using a
> generic all-device iterator and, since the segment number is included
> in every log line anyway, it didn't add much value anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>
>
> v3:
> - Addressed review comments from Roger.
>
> v2:
> - New in v2.
> ---
> xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c | 121
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> xen/include/xen/pci.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
> index e88689425d..4bb9996049 100644
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
> @@ -1134,64 +1134,87 @@ static void __hwdom_init setup_one_hwdom_device(const
> struct setup_hwdom *ctxt,
> ctxt->d->domain_id, err);
> }
>
> -static int __hwdom_init _setup_hwdom_pci_devices(struct pci_seg *pseg, void
> *arg)
> +static int __hwdom_init setup_hwdom_pci_device(struct pci_dev *pdev, void
> *arg)
> {
> struct setup_hwdom *ctxt = arg;
> - int bus, devfn;
> + struct domain *d = ctxt->d;
>
> - for ( bus = 0; bus < 256; bus++ )
> + if ( !pdev->domain )
> + {
> + pdev->domain = d;
> + list_add(&pdev->domain_list, &d->pdev_list);
> + setup_one_hwdom_device(ctxt, pdev);
> + }
> + else if ( pdev->domain == dom_xen )
> {
> - for ( devfn = 0; devfn < 256; devfn++ )
> + pdev->domain = d;
> + setup_one_hwdom_device(ctxt, pdev);
> + pdev->domain = dom_xen;
> + }
> + else if ( pdev->domain != d )
> + printk(XENLOG_WARNING "Dom%pd owning %04x:%02x:%02x.%u?\n",
Just %pd. It takes care of rendering d%u or d[$name] for system domains.
Can be fixed on commit.
> + pdev->domain, pdev->seg, pdev->bus, PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn),
> + PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn));
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +struct psdi_ctxt {
> + int (*cb)(struct pci_dev *, void *);
> + void *arg;
> +};
> +
> +static int pci_segment_devices_iterate(struct pci_seg *pseg, void *arg)
> +{
> + struct psdi_ctxt *ctxt = arg;
> + unsigned int bus, devfn;
> + int rc = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * We don't iterate by walking pseg->alldevs_list here because that
> + * would make the pcidevs_unlock()/lock() sequence below unsafe.
> + */
> + for ( bus = 0; !rc && bus < 256; bus++ )
> + for ( devfn = 0; !rc && devfn < 256; devfn++ )
> {
> struct pci_dev *pdev = pci_get_pdev(pseg->nr, bus, devfn);
>
> if ( !pdev )
> continue;
>
> - if ( !pdev->domain )
> - {
> - pdev->domain = ctxt->d;
> - list_add(&pdev->domain_list, &ctxt->d->pdev_list);
> - setup_one_hwdom_device(ctxt, pdev);
> - }
> - else if ( pdev->domain == dom_xen )
> - {
> - pdev->domain = ctxt->d;
> - setup_one_hwdom_device(ctxt, pdev);
> - pdev->domain = dom_xen;
> - }
> - else if ( pdev->domain != ctxt->d )
> - printk(XENLOG_WARNING "Dom%d owning %04x:%02x:%02x.%u?\n",
> - pdev->domain->domain_id, pseg->nr, bus,
> - PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn));
> -
> - if ( iommu_verbose )
> - {
> - pcidevs_unlock();
> - process_pending_softirqs();
> - pcidevs_lock();
> - }
> - }
> + rc = ctxt->cb(pdev, ctxt->arg);
>
> - if ( !iommu_verbose )
> - {
> + /*
> + * Err on the safe side and assume the callback has taken
> + * a significant amount of time.
> + */
> pcidevs_unlock();
> process_pending_softirqs();
> pcidevs_lock();
> }
> - }
>
> - return 0;
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> +int pci_pdevs_iterate(int (*cb)(struct pci_dev *, void *), void *arg)
> +{
> + struct psdi_ctxt ctxt = { .cb = cb, .arg = arg };
> + int rc;
> +
> + pcidevs_lock();
> + rc = pci_segments_iterate(pci_segment_devices_iterate, &ctxt);
> + pcidevs_unlock();
> +
> + return rc;
> }
>
> void __hwdom_init setup_hwdom_pci_devices(
> struct domain *d, int (*handler)(u8 devfn, struct pci_dev *))
> {
> struct setup_hwdom ctxt = { .d = d, .handler = handler };
> + int rc = pci_pdevs_iterate(setup_hwdom_pci_device, &ctxt);
>
> - pcidevs_lock();
> - pci_segments_iterate(_setup_hwdom_pci_devices, &ctxt);
> - pcidevs_unlock();
> + ASSERT(!rc);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> @@ -1294,24 +1317,18 @@ bool_t pcie_aer_get_firmware_first(const struct
> pci_dev *pdev)
> }
> #endif
>
> -static int _dump_pci_devices(struct pci_seg *pseg, void *arg)
> +static int dump_pci_device(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *arg)
> {
> - struct pci_dev *pdev;
> struct msi_desc *msi;
>
> - printk("==== segment %04x ====\n", pseg->nr);
> -
> - list_for_each_entry ( pdev, &pseg->alldevs_list, alldevs_list )
> - {
> - printk("%04x:%02x:%02x.%u - dom %-3d - node %-3d - MSIs < ",
> - pseg->nr, pdev->bus,
> - PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn), PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn),
> - pdev->domain ? pdev->domain->domain_id : -1,
> - (pdev->node != NUMA_NO_NODE) ? pdev->node : -1);
> - list_for_each_entry ( msi, &pdev->msi_list, list )
> - printk("%d ", msi->irq);
> - printk(">\n");
> - }
> + printk("%04x:%02x:%02x.%u - dom %-3d - node %-3d - MSIs < ",
> + pdev->seg, pdev->bus, PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn),
> + PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn),
> + pdev->domain ? pdev->domain->domain_id : -1,
> + (pdev->node != NUMA_NO_NODE) ? pdev->node : -1);
> + list_for_each_entry ( msi, &pdev->msi_list, list )
> + printk("%d ", msi->irq);
I know you're just copying the existing code, but this would be better
to strip the space after the <, and use " %d" here, which will drop the
final space before the > in the eventual output.
Again, can be fixed on commit.
~Andrew
> + printk(">\n");
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1319,9 +1336,7 @@ static int _dump_pci_devices(struct pci_seg *pseg, void
> *arg)
> static void dump_pci_devices(unsigned char ch)
> {
> printk("==== PCI devices ====\n");
> - pcidevs_lock();
> - pci_segments_iterate(_dump_pci_devices, NULL);
> - pcidevs_unlock();
> + pci_pdevs_iterate(dump_pci_device, NULL);
> }
>
> static int __init setup_dump_pcidevs(void)
> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/pci.h b/xen/include/xen/pci.h
> index 04a9f46cc3..79eb25417b 100644
> --- a/xen/include/xen/pci.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/pci.h
> @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ int find_upstream_bridge(u16 seg, u8 *bus, u8 *devfn, u8
> *secbus);
> struct pci_dev *pci_lock_pdev(int seg, int bus, int devfn);
> struct pci_dev *pci_lock_domain_pdev(
> struct domain *, int seg, int bus, int devfn);
> +int pci_pdevs_iterate(int (*cb)(struct pci_dev *, void *), void *arg);
>
> void setup_hwdom_pci_devices(struct domain *,
> int (*)(u8 devfn, struct pci_dev *));
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |