[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7] x86/emulate: Send vm_event from emulate
On 30.07.2019 16:27, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 30.07.2019 14:21, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote: >> >>>>>>> @@ -629,6 +697,14 @@ static void *hvmemul_map_linear_addr( >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ASSERT(p2mt == p2m_ram_logdirty || >>>>>>> !p2m_is_readonly(p2mt)); >>>>>>> } >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> + if ( curr->arch.vm_event && >>>>>>> + curr->arch.vm_event->send_event && >>>>>>> + hvm_emulate_send_vm_event(addr, gfn, pfec) ) >>>>>>> + { >>>>>>> + err = ERR_PTR(~X86EMUL_RETRY); >>>>>>> + goto out; >>>>>>> + } >>>>>> >>>>>> Did you notice that there's an immediate exit from the loop only >>>>>> in case the linear -> physical translation fails? This is >>>>>> relevant for page fault delivery correctness for accesses >>>>>> crossing page boundaries. I think you want to use >>>>>> update_map_err() and drop the "goto out". I can't really make up >>>>> >>>>> By update_map_err() are you saying to have the err var assigned and then >>>>> drop "goto out"? If so how do I keep the err from my access violation >>>>> without exiting from the loop? >>>> >>>> Counter question: Why do you _need_ to keep "your" value of err? >>>> If, just as an example, there's going to be a #PF on the other >>>> half of the access, then "your" access violation is of no interest >>>> at all. >>> >>> You are right, there is no need to keep the "goto out" here. It was just >>> for optimization in the idea that there is no need to do further steps >>> but I can drop the "goto out" and the code will work the same. >>> >> >> There is a problem with dropping the "goto out". If everything goes fine >> then it will return the mapping and I don't want that. This can be >> stopped by checking if ( err ) after the loop and it is not null then >> goto out. And going with this idea I can init *err = NULL and drop the >> err = NULL from hvmemul_map_linear_addr(). Is this ok for the next version? > > I'd prefer to see the code to decide. If you want this settled before > sending the next full version, then please send at least the resulting > patch hunk(s). > Here is a diff for hvmemul_map_linear_addr(): diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c index d75d3e6fd6..49dbfa730c 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c @@ -543,10 +543,11 @@ static void *hvmemul_map_linear_addr( struct hvm_emulate_ctxt *hvmemul_ctxt) { struct vcpu *curr = current; - void *err, *mapping; + void *err = NULL, *mapping; unsigned int nr_frames = ((linear + bytes - !!bytes) >> PAGE_SHIFT) - (linear >> PAGE_SHIFT) + 1; unsigned int i; + gfn_t gfn; /* * mfn points to the next free slot. All used slots have a page reference @@ -585,7 +586,7 @@ static void *hvmemul_map_linear_addr( ASSERT(mfn_x(*mfn) == 0); res = hvm_translate_get_page(curr, addr, true, pfec, - &pfinfo, &page, NULL, &p2mt); + &pfinfo, &page, gfn, &p2mt); switch ( res ) { @@ -599,7 +600,6 @@ static void *hvmemul_map_linear_addr( goto out; case HVMTRANS_bad_gfn_to_mfn: - err = NULL; goto out; case HVMTRANS_gfn_paged_out: @@ -622,14 +622,22 @@ static void *hvmemul_map_linear_addr( } if ( p2mt == p2m_ioreq_server ) - { - err = NULL; goto out; - } ASSERT(p2mt == p2m_ram_logdirty || !p2m_is_readonly(p2mt)); + + if ( curr->arch.vm_event && + curr->arch.vm_event->send_event && + hvm_emulate_send_vm_event(addr, gfn, pfec) ) + err = ERR_PTR(~X86EMUL_RETRY); } } + /* Check if any vm_event was sent */ + if ( err ) + goto out; /* Entire access within a single frame? */ if ( nr_frames == 1 ) Alex _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |