[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] xen/doc: Improve Dom0-less documentation
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 11:40 AM Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > Hi Julien, > On 7/31/19 9:10 AM, Viktor Mitin wrote: > > - Changed unprintable characters with %s/\%xA0/ /g > > So all the spaces are 0x20 now. > > > > - Added address-cells and size-cells to configuration example. > > This resolves the dom0less boot issue in case of arm64. > > > > - Added some notes about xl tools usage in case of dom0less. > > > > Signed-off-by: Viktor Mitin <viktor_mitin@xxxxxxxx> > > --- > > v4 updates: > > - fixed cpus <1>; > > - added memory size note; > > - changed some numbers to decimal; > > > > --- > > docs/features/dom0less.pandoc | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/docs/features/dom0less.pandoc b/docs/features/dom0less.pandoc > > index e076e3739e..a2c95d1fd4 100644 > > --- a/docs/features/dom0less.pandoc > > +++ b/docs/features/dom0less.pandoc > > @@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ to boot. For example if this is the bootcmd for Xen and > > Dom0: > > > > bootm 0x1400000 0x9000000 0x1280000 > > > > -If we want to add one DomU with Image-DomU as the DomU kernel > > -and ramdisk-DomU as DomU ramdisk: > > +If we want to add one DomU with Image-DomU as the DomU kernel > > +and ramdisk-DomU as DomU ramdisk: > > > > tftpb 0x1280000 xen.dtb > > tftpb 0x80000 xen-Image > > @@ -61,27 +61,32 @@ the presence of the additional VM and its > > configuration. It is done via > > device tree adding a node under /chosen as follows: > > > > domU1 { > > - compatible = "xen,domain"; > > - memory = <0x20000>; > > - cpus = 1; > > - vpl011; > > - > > - module@2000000 { > > - compatible = "multiboot,kernel", "multiboot,module"; > > - reg = <0x2000000 0xffffff>; > > - bootargs = "console=ttyAMA0"; > > - }; > > - > > - module@30000000 { > > - compatible = "multiboot,ramdisk", "multiboot,module"; > > - reg = <0x3000000 0xffffff>; > > - }; > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > + compatible = "xen,domain"; > > + memory = <0 524288>; > > For a first, the new value does not match the old one (0x20000 = 131072 > in decimal). > > However, this does not makes much sense to describe the memory size in > decimal here and ... > > > + cpus = <1>; > > + vpl011; > > + > > + module@2000000 { > > + compatible = "multiboot,kernel", "multiboot,module"; > > + reg = <0x2000000 0xffffff>; > > ... here in hexadecimal. For memory, it is fairly common to use hexadecimal. > > I can switch the memory property back to hexadecimal on commit. But I > would like to understand why the value has changed before doing that. Ok, let's keep hexadecimal. 128Mb is ok in this example, I use 512Mb for my tests, so while testing this example I changed it and didn't restore. This should be left untouched, as you mentioned. memory = <0x0 0x20000>; Thanks > > Cheers, > > -- > Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |