|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/AMD: Fix handling of x87 exception pointers on Fam17h hardware
On 04.09.2019 19:57, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> AMD Pre-Fam17h CPUs "optimise" {F,}X{SAVE,RSTOR} by not saving/restoring
> FOP/FIP/FDP if an x87 exception isn't pending. This causes an information
> leak, CVE-2006-1056, and worked around by several OSes, including Xen. AMD
> Fam17h CPUs no longer have this leak, and advertise so in a CPUID bit.
>
> Introduce the RSTR_FP_ERR_PTRS feature, as specified by AMD, and expose to all
> guests by default. While adjusting libxl's cpuid table, add CLZERO which
> looks to have been omitted previously.
>
> Also introduce an X86_BUG bit to trigger the (F)XRSTOR workaround, and set it
> on AMD hardware where RSTR_FP_ERR_PTRS is not advertised. Optimise the
> conditions for the workaround paths.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
irrespective of a few remarks:
> v3:
> * Rename to X86_BUG_FPU_PTRS
While I did agree to use this name, I'd still like to point out that
whether or not this is viewed as a bug is a matter of the position
one takes. I'm pretty sure the AMD engineers originally having decided
to avoid saving/restoring these value wouldn't have called this a bug,
but a feature.
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/amd.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/amd.c
> @@ -580,6 +580,13 @@ static void init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> }
>
> /*
> + * Older AMD CPUs don't save/load FOP/FIP/FDP unless an FPU exception
> + * is pending. Xen works around this at (F)XRSTOR time.
> + */
> + if ( !cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_RSTR_FP_ERR_PTRS) )
> + setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_BUG_FPU_PTRS);
I think in this file you want to omit the blanks immediately inside
the if() parentheses.
> @@ -169,11 +167,11 @@ static inline void fpu_fxsave(struct vcpu *v)
> : "=m" (*fpu_ctxt) : "R" (fpu_ctxt) );
>
> /*
> - * AMD CPUs don't save/restore FDP/FIP/FOP unless an exception
> - * is pending.
> + * Some CPUs don't save/restore FDP/FIP/FOP unless an exception is
> + * pending. In this case, the restore side will arrange safe values,
> + * and there is no point trying to restore FCS/FDS in addition.
> */
> - if ( !(fpu_ctxt->fsw & 0x0080) &&
> - boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD )
> + if ( cpu_bug_fpu_ptrs && !(fpu_ctxt->fsw & 0x0080) )
> return;
Could I talk you into s/trying to restore/trying to collect/ for the
comment? The consumer of the collected data could in principle be
other than the corresponding restore code, e.g. the insn emulator.
(hvmemul_put_fpu() has an example of the opposite direction, i.e.
producing data for the restore logic to consume.)
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |