Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/5] xen/arm: optee: remove experimental status

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Volodymyr,

On 9/11/19 7:41 PM, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
> Julien Grall writes:
>
> > On 8/23/19 8:20 PM, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
> > > Hi Julien,
> > Hi,
> >
> > Apologies for the delay.
> It is okay. I myself was busy a bit.
>
> > > Julien Grall writes:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On 8/23/19 7:48 PM, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
> > > > > As all TODOs and potential security issues are resolved now,
> > > > > remove experimental status from OP-TEE mediator.
> > > > Looking at SUPPORT.MD, I think OP-TEE without this series would be
> > > > considered as "Experimental".
> > > Right.
> > >
> > > > With this series applied, I still think we should keep the Kconfig
> > > > behind EXPERT but mark it as "Technical Preview" for at least a
> > > > release. This would encourage people to test and report any potential
> > > > issues with OP-TEE.
> > > >
> > > > We can re-discuss about the state in a few months for future release.
> > > >
> > > > BTW, SUPPORT.MD should be updated to reflect the state of OP-TEE in Xen.
> > > Fair enough. In the next version I'll replace this patch with patch to
> > > SUPPORT.md. Or it is better to push separate patch for the documentation?
> > I think the patch in SUPPORT.MD should go regardless of the state of
> > the rest. It is fine to keep it in this series.
> Okay. By the way, I skimmed thru SUPPORT.MD and I'm not sure what is the
> best place to describe mediator. So I could use some advice there.
Good question. I would put it under "## Virtual Hardware, Hypervisor". 
Maybe after the subsection "### ARM: Guest ACPI support"?
Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel