Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 141990: regressions - FAIL

[Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jürgen Groß <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 30 September 2019 10:30
> To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; osstest service owner 
> <osstest-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 141990: regressions - FAIL
> 
> On 30.09.19 11:17, Paul Durrant wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: 30 September 2019 10:07
> >> To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>; 
> >> osstest service owner
> <osstest-
> >> admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 141990: regressions - FAIL
> >>
> >> On 30.09.2019 10:15, Paul Durrant wrote:
> >>> I can't find anything conclusive in the logs, but it looks like it's 
> >>> mainly AMD h/w that's the
> >> problem and on at least one of the test failures I see lots of this kind 
> >> of thing in the serial
> log:
> >>>
> >>> Sep 29 17:33:55.316422 [  169.828563] AMD-Vi: Event logged [[  
> >>> 169.831798] IO_PAGE_FAULT
> >> device=00:13.1 domain=0x0006 address=0x0000000000000080 flags=0x0020]
> >>> Sep 29 17:33:55.376595 [  169.840481] AMD-Vi: Event logged [[  
> >>> 169.843716] IO_PAGE_FAULT
> >> device=00:13.1 domain=0x0006 address=0x0000000000000080 flags=0x0020]
> >>> Sep 29 17:33:55.388469 [  169.852398] AMD-Vi: Event logged [[  
> >>> 169.855627] IO_PAGE_FAULT
> >> device=00:13.1 domain=0x0006 address=0x0000000000000080 flags=0x0020]
> >>> Sep 29 17:33:55.400486 [  169.864311] AMD-Vi: Event logged [[  
> >>> 169.867540] IO_PAGE_FAULT
> >> device=00:13.1 domain=0x0006 address=0x0000000000000080 flags=0x0020]
> >>> Sep 29 17:33:55.412559 [  169.876224] AMD-Vi: Event logged [[  
> >>> 169.879458] IO_PAGE_FAULT
> >> device=00:13.1 domain=0x0006 address=0x0000000000000080 flags=0x0020]
> >>
> >
> > Ah yes, they might be. Still not found anything useful in other logs.
> 
> One case was for stub-dm, another one for migration.
> 
> I could imagine info->passthrough isn't initialized properly for the
> stubdom case, and maybe the information is missing in the migration
> stream, too?
> 

True, the last minute addition of the 'default' option could have messed things 
up. I'll check that scenario.

  Paul

> 
> Juergen

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel