Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 143061: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>]

(+Ian and Stefano)

Hi,

On 10/24/19 8:13 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 24.10.19 08:47, osstest service owner wrote:
> > flight 143061 xen-unstable real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/143061/
> >
> > Regressions :-(
> >
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> >   test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm    <job 
> > status>   broken
> >   test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 4 
> > host-install(4) broken REGR. vs. 142750
> Why is Linux kernel 5.4.0-rc4 being used for testing xen-unstable here?
> Or am I reading the logs wrong?
>
> >   test-arm64-arm64-examine    11 examine-serial/bootloader fail REGR. 
> > vs. 142750
> I'm not sure what has gone wrong here? The serial logs seem to be fine
> for me, but maybe I'm missing something?
This is a known issue on rochesters for the past 6 months (see [1]). In 
short, Osstest is checking the sanity of the platform by adding cookie 
in the bootloader output. However, this cookie is lost.
Stefano promised to investigate it back then. Last time I heard, he had 
access to the colo. Stefano where are we with this?
Cheers,

[1] https://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2019-05/msg00018.html

> Juergen
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel