[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 7/7] arm/gic-v3: add GIC version suffix to iomem range variables
- To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrii Anisov <andrii.anisov@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: Andrii Anisov <Andrii_Anisov@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:05:33 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=epam.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=epam.com; dkim=pass header.d=epam.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=d+fqswc2KAYIB3mDKfkj0IX+kQgIO94LkOkPKb4NvVU=; b=IB/gBdYcby62ZbwjBITOm1jQbUuM6uZqjT0+D1fu4HUGDpwCYULpwPKtdNq0EOR3Me2GltfzG1+SyEpTH5hAr/WN15gEi82eBegXyBRGUjQByFCYT0Uv+Tjl/n0FSWisItmMkK2XJzinbYUiNVipavmjkPfKHQVe2WvixnTgr4QnlFjp3oDjuHCuglDG8iVL8eplmNSeKM9MsNLAZTNFaUjQvQ4J8v2/Q1UbBUZGjTRTx0RD//TQjIpONr7oEvC3B4MbBktY9rQbgw+mTm16sSLrnnx75FKQPMtrAnJWMJhQk2NE5OcbuI0N0kdzI3IkhxZ3Voxu+Rpidgg6D3M4Ug==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=jjIf3rFadWto2otr6lFn6d5WtVP9Us7g00SQnyTKjKycW8rci5Jvh8EOUzknEBagkY+dNrsATyNjmNw/65EDmBEsd1AOcl3gR2VJwqzF8Ihl+yqSqpmjHKbOH9SeWNqusQP0faQYmK8MFK1a+QyL4s080Oeo56QeahzqshfYWOdg13HXU2Zs6wxj7YbmdlcoMp26/4eYFuX7EFXLcG8ua8a2MprnXF87fHWAKo2GBvH9G9NKIEuqQba1CDwpTPP3Kb/BudVHU7Cat7XI+HzYiJhH+TVcfNjyFXK0cfTkIXHSTUM+bpGeYU91W1ra3DJse0bdv3ZCiA8LwfJhA9rDMQ==
- Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Andrii_Anisov@xxxxxxxx;
- Cc: "lars.kurth.xen@xxxxxxxxx" <lars.kurth.xen@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, "fusa-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <fusa-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:05:41 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Thread-index: AQHVlINN4KWrn2fXKE6a8Sgjwi+91KeGfN2AgAPnIoCAClVAAIAAspS5
- Thread-topic: [RFC 7/7] arm/gic-v3: add GIC version suffix to iomem range variables
Hello Stefano,
I suppose, in the discussion with ARM, it might be useful to come with existing support case numbers.
Here they are:
ANDRII ANISOV
Lead Systems Engineer
Office: +380
44 390 5457 x 66766 Cell: +380
50 573 8852 Email: andrii_anisov@xxxxxxxx
Kyiv, Ukraine (GMT+3) epam.com
CONFIDENTIALITY CAUTION AND DISCLAIMER
This message is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) to which it is addressed and contains information that is legally privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible for delivering the
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. All unintended recipients are obliged to delete this message and destroy any printed copies.
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 12:23 AM
To: Andrii Anisov <andrii.anisov@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andrii Anisov <Andrii_Anisov@xxxxxxxx>; Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>; Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>; fusa-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<fusa-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; lars.kurth.xen@xxxxxxxxx <lars.kurth.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC 7/7] arm/gic-v3: add GIC version suffix to iomem range variables
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, Andrii Anisov wrote:
> Hello Stefano,
>
> On 11.11.19 22:59, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > this seems a very serious compiler bug.
>
> Yep.
>
> > This, together with the other bug described in the previous patch, makes
> > me think the ARMCC is not quite ready for showtime.
>
> Yet, this particular ARM Compiler version is safety certified and LTS.
>
> > Do you know if there
> > are any later version of the compiler that don't have these problems?
>
> I don't know, ARM did not say something special about it. As I know, the
> reason to take this compiler version was that it is the "latest and greatest"
> safety certified
>
> > I would hate to introduce these workarounds
>
> I hated finding and publishing these workarounds, but here we are.
>
> The main question here is if XEN needs a tag "Support safety certified
> compiler" by the cost of accepting such workarounds.
> Then discuss how to reduce their stench.
Before we get to that point, maybe we can raise the issue with Arm using
our combined channels. I'll raise it internally at Xilinx, and we could
also discuss it during one of the next FuSa calls (list in CC).
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|