[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/9] Add alternative API for Xen PTEs
I have addressed the comments that I can find in the archive. Some big debates (like _new or not _new, whether to modularise map_pages_to_xen) have not been touched. Various acked-by and reviewed-by added. Hongyan On Thu, 2019-12-05 at 10:14 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 04.12.2019 18:10, Hongyan Xia wrote: > > NOTE: My email address has changed due to some HR management. I > > have > > lost all my previous emails and I could only salvage some of the > > comments to v3 from the mailing list archive. I will reply to the > > comments from v3 in this v4 series. > > I'm afraid this isn't very helpful. In particular, does this mean > v4 is effectively v3, i.e. no review comments taken care of? Or > just some of them, and others left out? I'm not fancying re- > reviewing a version that doesn't have prior comments taken care > of. Please clarify. > > Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |