Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.13] xen: Drop bogus BOOLEAN definitions, TRUE and FALSE

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

On 06.12.2019 22:02, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 12/11/2019 14:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Bottom line - I'm half convinced and willing to give my ack, but
>> I'm not convinced you truly thought through the longer term
>> consequences. I'd therefore be far happier to see this patch
>> split into a non-controversial part (anything that's not tied to
>> the ACPI and EFI header imports), an ACPI, and an EFI part.
> 
> I do not want to writing the same patch again in $N years time because
> review and CI missed it creeping back in.
> 
> I don't think this is an unreasonable position to take.

It for sure isn't. Yet I also don't think though my request how to
split things is. By asking for the split I'm implying that we may
still reach agreement on the controversial parts, faod. Sadly once
again there are no other opinions helping to sort which route may
be the overall preferred one.

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel