[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 11/11] x86: tsc: avoid system instability in hibernation
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 11:45:26PM +0000, Anchal Agarwal wrote: > From: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@xxxxxxxxxx> > > System instability are seen during resume from hibernation when system > is under heavy CPU load. This is due to the lack of update of sched > clock data, and the scheduler would then think that heavy CPU hog > tasks need more time in CPU, causing the system to freeze > during the unfreezing of tasks. For example, threaded irqs, > and kernel processes servicing network interface may be delayed > for several tens of seconds, causing the system to be unreachable. > The fix for this situation is to mark the sched clock as unstable > as early as possible in the resume path, leaving it unstable > for the duration of the resume process. This will force the > scheduler to attempt to align the sched clock across CPUs using > the delta with time of day, updating sched clock data. In a post > hibernation event, we can then mark the sched clock as stable > again, avoiding unnecessary syncs with time of day on systems > in which TSC is reliable. This makes no frigging sense what so bloody ever. If the clock is stable, we don't care about sched_clock_data. When it is stable you get a linear function of the TSC without complicated bits on. When it is unstable, only then do we care about the sched_clock_data. > Reviewed-by: Erik Quanstrom <quanstro@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Frank van der Linden <fllinden@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Balbir Singh <sblbir@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Munehisa Kamata <kamatam@xxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Anchal Agarwal <anchalag@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- NAK, the code very much relies on never getting marked stable again after it gets set to unstable. > diff --git a/kernel/sched/clock.c b/kernel/sched/clock.c > index 1152259a4ca0..374d40e5b1a2 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/clock.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/clock.c > @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static void __scd_stamp(struct sched_clock_data *scd) > scd->tick_raw = sched_clock(); > } > > -static void __set_sched_clock_stable(void) > +void set_sched_clock_stable(void) > { > struct sched_clock_data *scd; > > @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static int __init sched_clock_init_late(void) > smp_mb(); /* matches {set,clear}_sched_clock_stable() */ > > if (__sched_clock_stable_early) > - __set_sched_clock_stable(); > + set_sched_clock_stable(); > > return 0; > } > -- > 2.15.3.AMZN > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |