[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/sm{e, a}p: do not enable SMEP/SMAP in PV shim by default on AMD
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 04:00:03PM +0000, Igor Druzhinin wrote: > Due to AMD and Hygon being unable to selectively trap CR4 bit modifications > running 32-bit PV guest inside PV shim comes with significant performance > hit. Moreover, for SMEP in particular every time CR4.SMEP changes on context > switch to/from 32-bit PV guest, it gets trapped by L0 Xen which then > tries to perform global TLB invalidation for PV shim domain. This usually > results in eventual hang of a PV shim with at least several vCPUs. > > Since the overall security risk is generally lower for shim Xen as it being > there more of a defense-in-depth mechanism, choose to disable SMEP/SMAP in > it by default on AMD and Hygon unless a user chose otherwise. > > Signed-off-by: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > I'm a little bit on the fence with this one. We're having the same issue with > general nested virt but I'm not inclined to trade security for a user in > general case. Disabling it by default for PV shim only seems rather inocuous > due to the use case restricion. I'd like to hear more opinions. > --- > docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc | 10 ++++++++-- > xen/arch/x86/setup.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------ > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc > b/docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc > index 981a5e2..05b2dde 100644 > --- a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc > +++ b/docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc > @@ -1936,19 +1936,25 @@ is 1MB. > ### smap (x86) > > `= <boolean> | hvm` > > -> Default: `true` > +> Default: `true` unless running in pv-shim mode on AMD or Hygon hardware > > Flag to enable Supervisor Mode Access Prevention > Use `smap=hvm` to allow SMAP use by HVM guests only. > > +In PV shim mode on AMD or Hygon hardware due to significant perfomance impact > +in some cases and generally lower security risk the option defaults to false. > + > ### smep (x86) > > `= <boolean> | hvm` > > -> Default: `true` > +> Default: `true` unless running in pv-shim mode on AMD or Hygon hardware > > Flag to enable Supervisor Mode Execution Protection > Use `smep=hvm` to allow SMEP use by HVM guests only. > > +In PV shim mode on AMD or Hygon hardware due to significant perfomance impact > +in some cases and generally lower security risk the option defaults to false. > + > ### smt (x86) > > `= <boolean>` > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c > index 5bdc229..8432b77 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c > @@ -105,9 +105,9 @@ struct cpuinfo_x86 __read_mostly boot_cpu_data = { 0, 0, > 0, 0, -1 }; > > unsigned long __read_mostly mmu_cr4_features = XEN_MINIMAL_CR4; > > -/* smep: Enable/disable Supervisor Mode Execution Protection (default on). */ > -#define SMEP_HVM_ONLY (-1) > -static s8 __initdata opt_smep = 1; > +/* smep: Enable/disable Supervisor Mode Execution Protection */ > +#define SMEP_HVM_ONLY (-2) > +static s8 __initdata opt_smep = -1; Could you change the type to int8_t instead of s8? (here and below, can be done on commit with the changes requested by Jan). Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |