[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 11/18] x86/mem_sharing: Replace MEM_SHARING_DEBUG with gdprintk
On 21.01.2020 18:49, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > @@ -538,24 +535,26 @@ static int audit(void) > d = get_domain_by_id(g->domain); > if ( d == NULL ) > { > - MEM_SHARING_DEBUG("Unknown dom: %hu, for PFN=%lx, MFN=%lx\n", > - g->domain, g->gfn, mfn_x(mfn)); > + gdprintk(XENLOG_ERR, > + "Unknown dom: %pd, for PFN=%lx, MFN=%lx\n", > + d, g->gfn, mfn_x(mfn)); With "if ( d == NULL )" around this you hardly mean to pass d to the function here. This is a case where you really need to stick to logging a raw number. > errors++; > continue; > } > o_mfn = get_gfn_query_unlocked(d, g->gfn, &t); > if ( !mfn_eq(o_mfn, mfn) ) > { > - MEM_SHARING_DEBUG("Incorrect P2M for d=%hu, PFN=%lx." > - "Expecting MFN=%lx, got %lx\n", > - g->domain, g->gfn, mfn_x(mfn), > mfn_x(o_mfn)); > + gdprintk(XENLOG_ERR, "Incorrect P2M for d=%pd, PFN=%lx." Here and elsewhere may I recommend dropping d= (or dom= further down)? > @@ -757,10 +756,10 @@ static int debug_mfn(mfn_t mfn) > return -EINVAL; > } > > - MEM_SHARING_DEBUG( > - "Debug page: MFN=%lx is ci=%lx, ti=%lx, owner=%pd\n", > - mfn_x(page_to_mfn(page)), page->count_info, > - page->u.inuse.type_info, page_get_owner(page)); > + gdprintk(XENLOG_ERR, > + "Debug page: MFN=%lx is ci=%lx, ti=%lx, owner_id=%d\n", > + mfn_x(page_to_mfn(page)), page->count_info, > + page->u.inuse.type_info, page_get_owner(page)->domain_id); As indicated before (I think), please prefer %pd and a struct domain pointer over passing ->domain_id (at least one more instance further down). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |