[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 1/2] xen/arm: remove physical timer offset
Hi, On 21/01/2020 15:07, Jeff Kubascik wrote: The physical timer traps apply an offset so that time starts at 0 for the guest. However, this offset is not currently applied to the physical counter. Per the ARMv8 Reference Manual (ARM DDI 0487E.a), section D11.2.4 Timers, the "Offset" between the counter and timer should be zero for a physical timer. This removes the offset to make the timer and counter consistent. This also cleans up the physical timer implementation to better match the virtual timer - both cval's now hold the hardware value. Signed-off-by: Jeff Kubascik <jeff.kubascik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++---------------- xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h | 3 --- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c b/xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c index 240a850b6e..0c78a65863 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c @@ -62,7 +62,6 @@ static void virt_timer_expired(void *data)int domain_vtimer_init(struct domain *d, struct xen_arch_domainconfig *config){ - d->arch.phys_timer_base.offset = NOW(); d->arch.virt_timer_base.offset = READ_SYSREG64(CNTPCT_EL0); d->time_offset.seconds = ticks_to_ns(d->arch.virt_timer_base.offset - boot_count); do_div(d->time_offset.seconds, 1000000000); @@ -108,7 +107,6 @@ int vcpu_vtimer_init(struct vcpu *v)init_timer(&t->timer, phys_timer_expired, t, v->processor);t->ctl = 0; - t->cval = NOW(); t->irq = d0 ? timer_get_irq(TIMER_PHYS_NONSECURE_PPI) : GUEST_TIMER_PHYS_NS_PPI; @@ -167,6 +165,7 @@ void virt_timer_restore(struct vcpu *v) static bool vtimer_cntp_ctl(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint32_t *r, bool read) { struct vcpu *v = current; + s_time_t expires;if ( !ACCESS_ALLOWED(regs, EL0PTEN) )return false; @@ -184,8 +183,9 @@ static bool vtimer_cntp_ctl(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint32_t *r, bool read)if ( v->arch.phys_timer.ctl & CNTx_CTL_ENABLE ){ - set_timer(&v->arch.phys_timer.timer, - v->arch.phys_timer.cval + v->domain->arch.phys_timer_base.offset); + expires = v->arch.phys_timer.cval > boot_count + ? ticks_to_ns(v->arch.phys_timer.cval - boot_count) : 0; + set_timer(&v->arch.phys_timer.timer, expires); While the factoring was optional, my request of a comment wasn't (even if it requires to duplicate 3 times). If you suggest a comment and an update of the commit message, I can merge it in this patch on commit. Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |