[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] docs/designs: Add a design document for migration of xenstore data
> -----Original Message----- > From: Xen-devel <xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Wei > Liu > Sent: 28 January 2020 13:46 > To: Durrant, Paul <pdurrant@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>; Julien Grall > <julien@xxxxxxx>; Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>; George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>; Ian Jackson > <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] docs/designs: Add a design > document for migration of xenstore data > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 12:28:23PM +0000, Paul Durrant wrote: > > +``` > > +0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 octet > > ++------------------------+------------------------+ > > +| type | record specific data | > > ++------------------------+ | > > +... > > ++-------------------------------------------------+ > > +``` > > + > > + > > +| Field | Description | > > +|---|---| > > +| `type` | 0x00000000: invalid | > > +| | 0x00000001: node data | > > +| | 0x00000002: watch data | > > +| | 0x00000003 - 0xFFFFFFFF: reserved for future use | > > + > > + > > +where data is always in the form of a NUL separated and terminated > tuple > > +as follows > > + > > Is there any padding requirement for a record? I take it there isn't? > No, the padding is at the generic record level (already part of the spec). Paul > Wei. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |