[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] PV DRM doesn't work without auto_translated_physmap feature in Dom0
On 2/5/20 8:59 PM, Santucco wrote: > Hello, > Ok, I commented out the memcpy call and run the test. > displ_be hasn’t crached, I have seen FLIP events in the log. > But there hasn’t been the black screen, just a blink effect every > couple of seconds. > Logs are attached. Ok, so I believe that frontend - backend (displ_be) communication is ok and there is nothing to do there. Next, I would start debugging the following in Xen: (XEN) mm.c:2223:d2v0 Bad L1 flags 80 and have a look at [1]. Probably, someone on Xen x86 side can tell if this could be related to the flags at [2]. > Best regards, > Alexander > > Среда, 5 февраля 2020, 9:31 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko > <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>: > On 2/4/20 10:28 AM, Santucco wrote: > > Hello, > > displ_be was compiled without zero-copy support early. > > I have tried with the recompiled dom0 kernel, a result is the same. > > Logs and configs (+displ_be’s CMakeCache.txt ) are attached. > Ok, yet another test to localize the problem. > Could you please remove memcpy from > #1 0x000055e5a1f28bec in Drm::DumbDrm::copy (this=0x7f9338000e00) at > /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.cpp:149 > and just memset the destination with 0 or whatever. > > I expect that system won't crash, nothing will be shown (black > screen), but > displ_be will show page flip events in its logs. > > Best regards, > > Alexander > > > > Понедельник, 3 февраля 2020, 10:36 +03:00 от Oleksandr > > Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx > </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>>: > > > > > > On 2/1/20 4:39 PM, Santucco wrote: > > > Hello again, > > > I have not yet made to work my drm client, so I have tried to run > > > linux like a domU (to see how it should work), it doesn’t work too > > > — displ_be catches SIGSEGV: > > > > > > #0 0x00007f4afed1c161 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6 > > > #1 0x000055723b9c5bec in Drm::DumbDrm::copy > > (this=0x7f4adc000e00) at > > > > > > /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/drm/Dumb.cpp:149 > > > #2 0x000055723b9a8f51 in BuffersStorage::getFrameBufferAndCopy > > > (this=0x7f4ae00010e0, fbCookie=18446612682295083264) at > > > > > > > /home/santucco/tmp/xen-troops/displ_be/src/displayBackend/BuffersStorage.cpp:165 > > > It tries to copy to mBuffer with non-accessible address. > > > For the moment I see a strange offset for mmap call of > > /dev/drm/card0 > > > in the strace log — 0x100000000. Is that normal? > > > Any direction of which to dig will be very helpful. > > > Configuration details: > > > Xen 4.12.1 Dom0: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo #13 SMP Sat Dec 28 > > 11:12:24 MSK > > > 2019 x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel > > GNU/Linux > > > DomU: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo > > > last xen-troops/libxenbe and xen-troops/displ_be > > > Logs (dmesg, xl dmesg, displ_be, strace log of displ_be), a > > backtrace > > > of gdb and kernel configs are attached. > > > Thanks in advance. > > Could you please try Dom0 kernel WITHOUT the options below: > > CONFIG_XEN_GNTDEV_DMABUF=y > > CONFIG_XEN_GRANT_DMA_ALLOC=y > > > > Then, just to make sure, did you build displ_be without zero-copy > > support? > > > > > On 1/8/20 5:38 PM, Santucco wrote: > > > > Thank you very much for all your answers. > > > > > > > > Среда, 8 января 2020, 10:54 +03:00 от Oleksandr Andrushchenko > > > > <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx > </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx> > > > > </compose?To=oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>>: > > > > On 1/6/20 10:38 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote: > > > > > On 06.01.20 08:56, Santucco wrote: > > > > >> Hello, > > > > >> > > > > >> I’m trying to use vdispl interface from PV OS, it doesn’t > work. > > > > >> Configuration details: > > > > >> Xen 4.12.1 > > > > >> Dom0: Linux 4.20.17-gentoo #13 SMP Sat Dec 28 > 11:12:24 MSK > > > > 2019 > > > > >> x86_64 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel > > > > GNU/Linux > > > > >> DomU: x86 Plan9, PV > > > > >> displ_be as a backend for vdispl and vkb > > > > >> > > > > >> when VM starts, displ_be reports about an error: > > > > >> gnttab: error: ioctl DMABUF_EXP_FROM_REFS failed: Invalid > > argument > > > > >> (displ_be.log:221) > > > > >> > > > > >> related Dom0 output is: > > > > >> [ 191.579278] Cannot provide dma-buf: use_ptemode 1 > > > > >> (dmesg.create.log:123) > > > > > > > > > > This seems to be a limitation of the xen dma-buf driver. > It was > > > > written > > > > > for being used on ARM initially where PV is not available. > > > > This is true and we never tried/targeted PV domains with this > > > > implementation, > > > > so if there is a need for that someone has to take a look on the > > > > proper > > > > implementation for PV… > > > > > > > > Have I got your right and there is no the proper > > implementation :-)? > > > There is no > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CC-ing Oleksandr Andrushchenko who is the author of that > > driver. He > > > > > should be able to tell us what would be needed to enable PV > > dom0. > > > > > > > > > > Depending on your use case it might be possible to use PVH > > dom0, but > > > > > support for this mode is "experimental" only and some features > > > > are not > > > > > yet working. > > > > > > > > > Well, one of the workarounds possible is to drop zero-copying > > use-case > > > > (this is why display backend tries to create dmu-bufs from > grants > > > > passed > > > > by the guest domain and fails because of "Cannot provide > dma-buf: > > > > use_ptemode 1") > > > > So, in this case display backend will do memory copying for the > > > > incoming > > > > frames > > > > and won't touch DMABUF_EXP_FROM_REFS ioctl. > > > > To do so just disable zero-copying while building the > backend [1] > > > > > > > > Thanks, I have just tried the workaround. The backend has failed > > > > in an other place not corresponding with dma_buf. > > > > Anyway it is enough to continue debugging my > > frontend implementation. > > > > Do you know how big is performance penalty in comparison with > > > > the zero-copy variant? > > > Well, it solely depends on your setup, so I cannot tell what > > > would the numbers be in your case. Comparing to what I have > doesn't > > > make any sense to me: one should compare apples to apples > > > > Does it make a sense if I make a dedicated HVM domain with > > linux only > > > > for the purpose of vdispl and vkbd backends? Is there a > hope this > > > > approach will work? > > > You can try if this approach fits your design and requirements > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Juergen > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L12 > > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!kZ1JQFRS2pXj_IuXBhvYhmP9Q_svcLyjCXK9465ULGB4MeiYPRz2cF7lepHggr9UxPU9zOBEUw$> > > > > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!kvDgy3X0IuSQk7D2DdsGtsjtyGroYbNKOrPG95OpyoAkuBVbFSmzozwfor05jkRl0ita0FumBw$> > > > > > > > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!gi81oZZNvWaFWUVnaZluA_mNBAItLMd4RZmnc-M_FmlpDojqeQQnS7aXSNlbo80re9uOl2wqFA$> > > > > > > > > > > > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/xen-troops/displ_be/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt*L12__;Iw!!GF_29dbcQIUBPA!mz3gn1wQMX2DXeNuAV-1_dI7nxFYYZOgdPiJNSFMesCz9lAzOKlwVPlddbxbcLmUO44NOy0TFA$> > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Alexander Sychev > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5/source/drivers/xen/gntdev.c#L300 [2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5/source/drivers/xen/gntdev.c#L319 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |