[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/8] x86/setup: Fix badpage= handling for memory above HYPERVISOR_VIRT_END
On 01.02.2020 01:32, David Woodhouse wrote: > --- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c > +++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c > @@ -1758,6 +1758,18 @@ int query_page_offline(mfn_t mfn, uint32_t *status) > return 0; > } > > +static unsigned long contig_avail_pages(struct page_info *pg, unsigned long > max_pages) > +{ > + unsigned long i; > + > + for ( i = 0 ; i < max_pages; i++) Nit: Stray blank before first semicolon. > + { > + if ( pg[i].count_info & PGC_broken ) > + break; > + } > + return i; Further nits: Commonly we omit the braces in cases like this one. We also like to have blank lines before the main return statement of a function. > @@ -1846,6 +1863,63 @@ static unsigned long avail_heap_pages( > return free_pages; > } > > +static void mark_bad_pages(void) __init please > +{ > + unsigned long bad_spfn, bad_epfn; > + const char *p; > + struct page_info *pg; > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86 > + const struct platform_bad_page *badpage; > + unsigned int i, j, array_size; > + > + badpage = get_platform_badpages(&array_size); > + if ( badpage ) > + { > + for ( i = 0; i < array_size; i++ ) > + { > + for ( j = 0; j < 1UL << badpage->order; j++ ) Either you mean badpage[i].* here and below, or you're missing an increment of badpage somewhere. > + { > + if ( mfn_valid(_mfn(badpage->mfn + j)) ) > + { > + pg = mfn_to_page(_mfn(badpage->mfn + j)); > + pg->count_info |= PGC_broken; > + page_list_add_tail(pg, &page_broken_list); > + } > + } > + } > + } > +#endif > + > + /* Check new pages against the bad-page list. */ > + p = opt_badpage; > + while ( *p != '\0' ) > + { > + bad_spfn = simple_strtoul(p, &p, 0); > + bad_epfn = bad_spfn; > + > + if ( *p == '-' ) > + { > + p++; > + bad_epfn = simple_strtoul(p, &p, 0); > + if ( bad_epfn < bad_spfn ) > + bad_epfn = bad_spfn; > + } > + > + if ( *p == ',' ) > + p++; > + else if ( *p != '\0' ) > + break; I think this common (with init_boot_pages()) part of parsing would better abstracted out, such there will be just one instance of, and hence there's no risk of things going out of sync. > + while ( mfn_valid(_mfn(bad_spfn)) && bad_spfn < bad_epfn ) As per init_boot_pages() as well as per the "bad_epfn = bad_spfn;" you have further up, the range here is inclusive at its end. I'm also uncertain about the stopping at the first !mfn_valid() - there may well be further valid pages later on. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |