Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: Remove unnecessary cast on void pointer

[Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 11:18:40AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> Thanks!
> 
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 11:08:35AM +0530, Simran Singhal wrote:
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c
> > index f049920196..a53d3ca2a4 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c
> > @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static int vvmcs_offset(u32 width, u32 type, u32 index)
> >  u64 get_vvmcs_virtual(void *vvmcs, u32 vmcs_encoding)
> >  {
> >      union vmcs_encoding enc;
> > -    u64 *content = (u64 *) vvmcs;
> > +    u64 *content = vvmcs;
> >      int offset;
> >      u64 res;
> >  
> > @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ enum vmx_insn_errno get_vvmcs_real_safe(const struct 
> > vcpu *v, u32 encoding,
> >  void set_vvmcs_virtual(void *vvmcs, u32 vmcs_encoding, u64 val)
> >  {
> >      union vmcs_encoding enc;
> > -    u64 *content = (u64 *) vvmcs;
> > +    u64 *content = vvmcs;
> 
> While there, would you mind changing u64 to uint64_t? (here and
> above)
> 

To add some context to this comment: new code has been using uintX
variants. We want to migrate existing code gradually. Since you're
touching these lines anyway, it is a good chance to do the migration.

When you do this in your next version, please add a line in the commit
message saying something along the line that "Take the chance to change
some u64 to uint64_t".

Wei.