[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2] xen/arm: implement GICD_I[S/C]ACTIVER reads
- To: Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>
- From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 149.199.60.83) smtp.rcpttodomain=xen.org smtp.mailfrom=xilinx.com; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=xilinx.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=PdIcjiLhfWOL6ylvSHUwMphztwroU6PYI+7VkROH3aU=; b=cp1ouxUNMPmeRYcOaZxDVSfJNhCICIiSjNvCEXh7WZ4u+EVGOO6mk72wxWa/fOSUDXKrp4zyeo+t7yB5QSTm65l5cF9B4lhV8536gk4PhxNd+4nIukeOUoYDv6VE4fewkmxSRl92f/DCVXUtZmLAevt2MzNU6kDiAfgNheBiIsfS+hUYS/5V04A/edpeuhdF8b9iFq60FrgTycq8yx1mEhrZGm1WhzVCbzvN2JPqFXyspp6nIE6h6HnXnUbgRhSDSgth/j1b6AlZHhc9fsQyeRbwRVeobgOcE1hYdokfJDGUwTym9Aeu7shlH5qmMA+PAu5AWYxHdUAP77MIRNe7iA==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Jc69E2zzooSJ5NNUFHfKRga0w26jQSod0NMW7MEehq2c4NSwg6RTrMxS/ITpafRw9pTHdpPORMdhqWUEUjLs506TlJKJmLSbYB/F/0+QWJK+TIekciiHQJowXSTZW2QiwzNjhOGrEAyGj4cCMF34fMqgUj7zXtW1L+CtO6YoQwpaGZViBpJ1XW7Qbnucr13Nddbf7AIqJwC5OMiKJJdD2WcjOT8g5Lu7KTRI2lsEpM/f+WzNLnOG1Az5ncICubIJn9BexWeBCaSHJ5i0igluJGg1lDSY8ZotbVsu6kuFTG78d8dNu+hDc/3Rg0pPYMZxF3SZ9zpdSKybaE/IOu+OLw==
- Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 149.199.60.83) smtp.mailfrom=xilinx.com; xen.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;xen.org; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=xilinx.com;
- Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, "maz@xxxxxxxxxx" <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Xu <xuwei5@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>, nd <nd@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien.grall.oss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 16:32:12 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Bertrand,
>
> On 17/04/2020 16:16, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> > It seems that the problem is a bit bigger then expected and will need more
> > discussion and thinking.
> > I did some research on my side and there are several design possible
> > depending on what should be the goal performance or real-time behaviour
> > (going from just give the status we have to fire a service interrupts when
> > any interrupts is acked by a guest to refresh our internal status).
> >
> > In the short term, could we not agree to fix the typo by returning always 0
> > and start a discussion on the vgic implementation ?
>
> I have already pointed out multiple time now ([1], [2]) that I would not
> oppose the temporary solution. I think this is a matter of someone (Stefano?)
> to submit it :).
>
> Cheers,
>
> [1] https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2019-11/msg01642.html
> [2] https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2020-04/msg00459.html
I can submit it. Julien, would you prefer the plain always return 0
patch, or would you prefer if I tried to get the latest ISACTIVER
information (like this patch does) but only for the local processor?
|
