[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] x86/hyperv: stash and use the configured max VP index
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:41:44AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > The value returned from CPUID is the maximum number for virtual > processors supported by Hyper-V. It could be larger than the maximum > number of virtual processors configured. > > Stash the configured number into a variable and use it in calculations. > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <liuwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/hyperv.c | 4 ++++ > xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/private.h | 1 + > xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/tlb.c | 2 +- > xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/util.c | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/hyperv.c > b/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/hyperv.c > index 91a6782cd986..84221b751453 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/hyperv.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/hyperv.c > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(void *, hv_input_page); > DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(void *, hv_vp_assist); > DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned int, hv_vp_index); > > +unsigned int __read_mostly hv_max_vp_index; > static bool __read_mostly hcall_page_ready; > > static uint64_t generate_guest_id(void) > @@ -143,6 +144,9 @@ static int setup_hypercall_pcpu_arg(void) > rdmsrl(HV_X64_MSR_VP_INDEX, vp_index_msr); > this_cpu(hv_vp_index) = vp_index_msr; > > + if ( vp_index_msr > hv_max_vp_index ) > + hv_max_vp_index = vp_index_msr; > + > return 0; > } > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/private.h > b/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/private.h > index 354fc7f685a7..fea3e291e944 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/private.h > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/private.h > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ > DECLARE_PER_CPU(void *, hv_input_page); > DECLARE_PER_CPU(void *, hv_vp_assist); > DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, hv_vp_index); > +extern unsigned int hv_max_vp_index; > > static inline unsigned int hv_vp_index(unsigned int cpu) > { > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/tlb.c b/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/tlb.c > index 1d723d6ee679..0a44071481bd 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/tlb.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/tlb.c > @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ int hyperv_flush_tlb(const cpumask_t *mask, const void > *va, > { > unsigned int vpid = hv_vp_index(cpu); > > - if ( vpid >= ms_hyperv.max_vp_index ) > + if ( vpid >= hv_max_vp_index ) I think the >= should be changed to > here. Wei. > { > local_irq_restore(irq_flags); > return -ENXIO; > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/util.c > b/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/util.c > index bec61c2afd87..2c5f421b7bd9 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/util.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/util.c > @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ int cpumask_to_vpset(struct hv_vpset *vpset, > { > int nr = 1; > unsigned int cpu, vcpu_bank, vcpu_offset; > - unsigned int max_banks = ms_hyperv.max_vp_index / 64; > + unsigned int max_banks = hv_max_vp_index / 64; > > /* Up to 64 banks can be represented by valid_bank_mask */ > if ( max_banks > 64 ) > -- > 2.20.1 >
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |