Re: [PATCH 6/7] xen/guest_access: Consolidate guest access helpers in xen/guest_access.h

[Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

On 29/04/2020 15:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 29.04.2020 16:04, Julien Grall wrote:
> > Gentle ping. Any comments on the direction to take?
> Just to avoid misunderstanding - while the mail was sent with me as
> the only one on the To list, I don't think I've been meant, as I've
> voiced my opinion. I assume you rather meant to ping others to chime
> in?
I barely pay attention to CC vs TO. If I am on the list of recipients of 
an e-mail, then I will at least have a glance.
This e-mail is directed to you specifically and also the others. While 
you may have voiced some of your opinion already, you haven't replied 
back how you would decide whether an header should be added in xen or 
asm-generic.
So can you please have another and explain how the line can be drawn 
with just two architectures in place.
Cheers,

--
Julien Grall