Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] x86: relax LDT check in arch_set_info_guest()

[Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 02:50:06PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> It is wrong for us to check the base address when there's no LDT in the
> first place. Once we don't do this check anymore we can also set the
> base address to a non-canonical value when the LDT is empty.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>

I wonder if a ldt_ents check should also be added to
pv_map_ldt_shadow_page in order to avoid trying to get the mapping of
the LDT.

Thanks, Roger.