Re: [BUG] PVH ACPI XSDT table construction

["Daniel P. Smith" <dpsmith.dev@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 5/26/20 1:57 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> 
> Keep in mind that strncmp will return 0 if the signature matches, and
> hence doing this won't allow any table, as it would require a
> signature to match both the DSDT and the FACS one (you would require
> strncmp to return 0 in both cases).
> 
> The code is correct AFAICT, as it won't add DSDT or FACS to the XSDT
> (because strncmp will return 0 in that case).
> 
> Roger.
> 

Ugh, your are right. Apologies for the noise.

V/r,
DPS