Re: [PATCH v2] x86/svm: retry after unhandled NPT fault if gfn was marked for recalculation

[Roger Pau Monné <roger@xxxxxxx>]

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 02:01:48AM +0100, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> If a recalculation NPT fault hasn't been handled explicitly in
> hvm_hap_nested_page_fault() then it's potentially safe to retry -
> US bit has been re-instated in PTE and any real fault would be correctly
> re-raised next time. Do it by allowing hvm_hap_nested_page_fault to
> fall through in that case.
> 
> This covers a specific case of migration with vGPU assigned on AMD:
> global log-dirty is enabled and causes immediate recalculation NPT
> fault in MMIO area upon access. This type of fault isn't described
> explicitly in hvm_hap_nested_page_fault (this isn't called on
> EPT misconfig exit on Intel) which results in domain crash.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - don't gamble with retrying every recal fault and instead let
>   hvm_hap_nested_page_fault know it's allowed to fall through in default case
> ---
>  xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c        | 6 +++---
>  xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c    | 7 ++++++-
>  xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c    | 2 +-
>  xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h | 2 +-
>  4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> index 74c9f84..42bd720 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> @@ -1731,7 +1731,7 @@ void hvm_inject_event(const struct x86_event *event)
>  }
>  
>  int hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(paddr_t gpa, unsigned long gla,
> -                              struct npfec npfec)
> +                              struct npfec npfec, bool fall_through)
>  {
>      unsigned long gfn = gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>      p2m_type_t p2mt;
> @@ -1740,7 +1740,7 @@ int hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(paddr_t gpa, unsigned 
> long gla,
>      struct vcpu *curr = current;
>      struct domain *currd = curr->domain;
>      struct p2m_domain *p2m, *hostp2m;
> -    int rc, fall_through = 0, paged = 0;
> +    int rc, paged = 0;
>      bool sharing_enomem = false;
>      vm_event_request_t *req_ptr = NULL;
>      bool sync = false;

I would assert that the parameter is never set when running on Intel,
since those code path is not supposed to use it.

I also wonder whether it would be possible to avoid passing a
parameter, and instead check whether the guest is in logdirty mode on
AMD and the fault is actually a logdirty triggered one. That would IMO
make it more robust since the caller doesn't need to care about
whether it's a recalc fault or not.

> @@ -1905,7 +1905,7 @@ int hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(paddr_t gpa, unsigned 
> long gla,
>              sync = p2m_mem_access_check(gpa, gla, npfec, &req_ptr);
>  
>              if ( !sync )
> -                fall_through = 1;
> +                fall_through = true;
>              else
>              {
>                  /* Rights not promoted (aka. sync event), work here is done 
> */
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
> index 46a1aac..8ef3fed 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -1695,7 +1695,12 @@ static void svm_do_nested_pgfault(struct vcpu *v,
>      else if ( pfec & NPT_PFEC_in_gpt )
>          npfec.kind = npfec_kind_in_gpt;
>  
> -    ret = hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(gpa, ~0ul, npfec);
> +    /*
> +     * US bit being set in error code indicates P2M type recalculation has
> +     * just been done meaning that it's possible there is nothing else to 
> handle
> +     * and we can just fall through and retry.
> +     */
> +    ret = hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(gpa, ~0ul, npfec, !!(pfec & 
> PFEC_user_mode));
>  
>      if ( tb_init_done )
>      {
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 11a4dd9..10f1eeb 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -3398,7 +3398,7 @@ static void ept_handle_violation(ept_qual_t q, paddr_t 
> gpa)
>      else
>          gla = ~0ull;
>  
> -    ret = hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(gpa, gla, npfec);
> +    ret = hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(gpa, gla, npfec, false);
>      switch ( ret )
>      {
>      case 0:         // Unhandled L1 EPT violation
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h
> index 1eb377d..03e5f1d 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h
> @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ void hvm_fast_singlestep(struct vcpu *v, uint16_t p2midx);
>  
>  struct npfec;
>  int hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(paddr_t gpa, unsigned long gla,
> -                              struct npfec npfec);
> +                              struct npfec npfec, bool fall_through);

I would rename fall_through to recalc, recalculate or misconfig. It's
not easy to understand the meaning of the parameter when looking at
the function prototype.

Thanks, Roger.