Re: [PATCH v4 for-4.14 2/2] pvcalls: Document correctly and explicitely the padding for all arches

[Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>]

On 29/06/2020 12:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 29.06.2020 12:03, Julien Grall wrote:
> > On 29/06/2020 09:28, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > On 27.06.2020 11:55, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > > As an aside, the padding sadly cannot be mandated to be 0 as they are
> > > > already present. So it is not going to be possible to use the padding
> > > > for extending a command in the future.
> > > Why is the other adjustment fine to make due to still being tech
> > > preview, but this one wouldn't be for the same reason?
> > This is mostly a left-over of the previous message. Although, I am not
> > really inclined to address this myself any time soon.
> Sure, I didn't mean to indicate I might expect you to. But perhaps
> here the wording could be slightly changed as well?
I am planning to remove the paragraph completely.

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall