Re: [PATCH v4 03/10] tools/libxl: add vmtrace_pt_size parameter

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

On 07.07.2020 13:17, Michał Leszczyński wrote:
> So would it be OK to use uint32_t everywhere and to store the trace buffer
> size as number of kB? I think this is the most straightforward option.
> 
> I would also stick with the name "processor_trace_buf_size"
> everywhere, both in the hypervisor, ABI and the toolstack, with the
> respective comments that the size is in kB.

Perhaps even more clearly "processor_trace_buf_kb" then?

Jan