[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] x86/xen: add system core suspend and resume callbacks
- To: Anchal Agarwal <anchalag@xxxxxxxxxx>, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx, jgross@xxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, kamatam@xxxxxxxxxx, sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx, konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx, roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, len.brown@xxxxxxxxx, pavel@xxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, eduval@xxxxxxxxxx, sblbir@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dwmw@xxxxxxxxxxxx, benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:08:05 +0100
- Delivery-date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 09:08:29 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
Hi,
On 02/07/2020 19:22, Anchal Agarwal wrote:
diff --git a/include/xen/xen-ops.h b/include/xen/xen-ops.h
index 2521d6a306cd..9fa8a4082d68 100644
--- a/include/xen/xen-ops.h
+++ b/include/xen/xen-ops.h
@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ u64 xen_steal_clock(int cpu);
int xen_setup_shutdown_event(void);
bool xen_is_xen_suspend(void);
+void xen_setup_syscore_ops(void);
The function is only implemented and used by x86. So shouldn't this be
declared in an x86 header?
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
|
