Re: [patch RFC 13/38] PCI: MSI: Rework pci_msi_domain_calc_hwirq()

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Aug 25 2020 at 15:03, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 02:24:37AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Retrieve the PCI device from the msi descriptor instead of doing so at the
>> call sites.
>
> I'd like it *better* with "PCI/MSI: " in the subject (to match history

Duh, yes.

> and other patches in this series) and "MSI" here in the commit log,
> but nice cleanup and:
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/msi.c
>> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_msi_prepare);
>>  
>>  void pci_msi_set_desc(msi_alloc_info_t *arg, struct msi_desc *desc)
>>  {
>> -    arg->msi_hwirq = pci_msi_domain_calc_hwirq(arg->msi_dev, desc);
>> +    arg->msi_hwirq = pci_msi_domain_calc_hwirq(desc);
>
> I guess it's safe to assume that "arg->msi_dev ==
> msi_desc_to_pci_dev(desc)"?  I didn't try to verify that.

It is.

>> +irq_hw_number_t pci_msi_domain_calc_hwirq(struct msi_desc *desc)
>>  {
>> +    struct pci_dev *pdev = msi_desc_to_pci_dev(desc);
>
> If you named this "struct pci_dev *dev" (not "pdev"), the diff would
> be a little smaller and it would match other usage in the file.

Ok. I'm always happy to see pdev because that doesn't make me wonder
which type of dev it is :) But, yeah lets keep it consistent.

Thanks,

        tglx