Re: [xen-unstable test] 153154: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

On 31.08.2020 16:23, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 06:40:56AM +0200, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>> On 30.08.20 18:11, osstest service owner wrote:
>>> flight 153154 xen-unstable real [real]
>>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153154/
>>>
>>> Regressions :-(
>>>
>>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>>> including tests which could not be run:
>>>   test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm    <job status>            
>>> broken
>>>   test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64    <job status>               
>>> broken
>>>   test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64    <job status>                 broken
>>>   test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 10 
>>> debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 152877
>>>   test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 10 
>>> debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 152877
>>
>> Paul, I suspect some fallout from your hotplug/mtu series?
>>
>> The failure in
>>
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153154/test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm/10.ts-debian-hvm-install.log
>>
>> is pointing in this direction IMO.
> 
> There's a stubdom panic at:
> 
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153154/test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm/godello0---var-log-xen-qemu-dm-debianhvm.guest.osstest.log
> 
> No idea if it's related to the MTU stuff or not. Seems to happen during
> netfront initialization, so might be related.

Might also be the netfront_init() changes in / for mini-os then.

Jan