Re: [PATCH v2.1] hvmloader: indicate dynamically allocated memory as ACPI NVS in e820

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

On 04.09.2020 16:47, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> The referenced commit is not unrelated - it's the commit introducing the 
> access
> causing kexec transition to fail. But I can add another one pointing to the 
> mapping
> of ACPI tables that was supposed to fix the failure caused by the first one.

Oh, okay, I finally understand. The purpose of the change is
unrelated, it's what get_acpi_srat_table() does which causes the
problem. Hopefully this will be more obvious with the other commit
also referenced. How about additionally changing "which is now a
requirement after" to "which is now a requirement in order for ...
to work" or "which is a prerequisite for ... actually functioning"
or some such?

Jan