[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [RFC PATCH] efi: const correct EFI functions
On 14.09.2020 17:05, Trammell Hudson wrote: > On Monday, September 14, 2020 10:55 AM, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 14.09.2020 16:46, Trammell Hudson wrote: >>> Option 3 would be to write wrappers for the few functions that are >>> used in the EFI boot path that cast-away the constness of their >>> arguments (while also silently cursing the UEFI forum for not >>> writing const-correct code). >> >> This would be kind of a last resort fallback (except for the >> cursing, which of course we can do at any time). > > Since you didn't like the time travel option, I checked to see > which functions would need to be wrapped. It is a surprisingly > small number: > > #define PrintStr(s) StdOut->OutputString(StdOut, (CHAR16 *)(s)) > #define PrintErr(s) StdErr->OutputString(StdErr, (CHAR16 *)(s)) > #define efi_file_open(file,handle,name,mode,attr) \ > (file)->Open(file, handle, (CHAR16 *)(name), mode, attr) > #define shim_verify(shim, ptr, len) \ > (shim)->Verify((void *)(ptr), len) That's surprisingly few. What about e.g. HandleProtocol() and LocateHandle()? GUIDs shouldn't really be non-const either. Jan
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |