[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 04/21] drm/exynos: Introduce GEM object functions
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:59:41PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in > struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with > per-instance callbacks in exynos. The only exception is gem_prime_mmap, > which is non-trivial to convert. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c | 10 ---------- > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c > index dbd80f1e4c78..fe46680ca208 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c > @@ -75,11 +75,6 @@ static void exynos_drm_postclose(struct drm_device *dev, > struct drm_file *file) > file->driver_priv = NULL; > } > > -static const struct vm_operations_struct exynos_drm_gem_vm_ops = { > - .open = drm_gem_vm_open, > - .close = drm_gem_vm_close, > -}; > - > static const struct drm_ioctl_desc exynos_ioctls[] = { > DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV(EXYNOS_GEM_CREATE, exynos_drm_gem_create_ioctl, > DRM_RENDER_ALLOW), > @@ -124,16 +119,11 @@ static struct drm_driver exynos_drm_driver = { > .open = exynos_drm_open, > .lastclose = drm_fb_helper_lastclose, > .postclose = exynos_drm_postclose, > - .gem_free_object_unlocked = exynos_drm_gem_free_object, > - .gem_vm_ops = &exynos_drm_gem_vm_ops, > .dumb_create = exynos_drm_gem_dumb_create, > .prime_handle_to_fd = drm_gem_prime_handle_to_fd, > .prime_fd_to_handle = drm_gem_prime_fd_to_handle, > .gem_prime_import = exynos_drm_gem_prime_import, > - .gem_prime_get_sg_table = exynos_drm_gem_prime_get_sg_table, > .gem_prime_import_sg_table = exynos_drm_gem_prime_import_sg_table, > - .gem_prime_vmap = exynos_drm_gem_prime_vmap, > - .gem_prime_vunmap = exynos_drm_gem_prime_vunmap, > .gem_prime_mmap = exynos_drm_gem_prime_mmap, > .ioctls = exynos_ioctls, > .num_ioctls = ARRAY_SIZE(exynos_ioctls), > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c > index efa476858db5..69a5cf28b4ae 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c > @@ -129,6 +129,19 @@ void exynos_drm_gem_destroy(struct exynos_drm_gem > *exynos_gem) > kfree(exynos_gem); > } > > +static const struct vm_operations_struct exynos_drm_gem_vm_ops = { > + .open = drm_gem_vm_open, > + .close = drm_gem_vm_close, > +}; Hm moving the drm_gem_cma_vm_ops into drm_gem.h or so and maybe calling them drm_gem_simple_ops or so would remove a pile of these. But perhaps a quick follow up series. Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > + > +static const struct drm_gem_object_funcs exynos_drm_gem_object_funcs = { > + .free = exynos_drm_gem_free_object, > + .get_sg_table = exynos_drm_gem_prime_get_sg_table, > + .vmap = exynos_drm_gem_prime_vmap, > + .vunmap = exynos_drm_gem_prime_vunmap, > + .vm_ops = &exynos_drm_gem_vm_ops, > +}; > + > static struct exynos_drm_gem *exynos_drm_gem_init(struct drm_device *dev, > unsigned long size) > { > @@ -143,6 +156,8 @@ static struct exynos_drm_gem *exynos_drm_gem_init(struct > drm_device *dev, > exynos_gem->size = size; > obj = &exynos_gem->base; > > + obj->funcs = &exynos_drm_gem_object_funcs; > + > ret = drm_gem_object_init(dev, obj, size); > if (ret < 0) { > DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev->dev, "failed to initialize gem object\n"); > -- > 2.28.0 > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |