Re: [PATCH] SUPPORT.MD: Clarify the support state for the Arm SMMUv{1, 2} drivers

[Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>]

On 23/09/2020 14:55, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> > On 23 Sep 2020, at 12:17, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> More that it make more sense in general to have SMMUv3 with 2 level of page 
> table supporting this then old SMMU versions.
Both driver are equally important. I wouldn't discard SMMUv2 just 
because there is a new shiny version.
I also have some concerns with the SMMUv3. They are pretty similar to 
the GICv3 ITS as both use a shared ring for the commands.
Cheers,

--
Julien Grall