[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [bug report] x86/xen: open code alloc_vm_area in arch_gnttab_valloc
Hello Christoph Hellwig, The patch a0e7ac6b4907: "x86/xen: open code alloc_vm_area in arch_gnttab_valloc" from Sep 23, 2020, leads to the following static checker warning: arch/x86/xen/grant-table.c:110 arch_gnttab_valloc() warn: did you mean to pass the address of 'area->ptes' arch/x86/xen/grant-table.c 93 static int gnttab_apply(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr, void *data) 94 { 95 pte_t ***p = data; 96 97 **p = pte; 98 (*p)++; 99 return 0; 100 } 101 102 static int arch_gnttab_valloc(struct gnttab_vm_area *area, unsigned nr_frames) 103 { 104 area->ptes = kmalloc_array(nr_frames, sizeof(*area->ptes), GFP_KERNEL); area->ptes is allocated here. 105 if (area->ptes == NULL) 106 return -ENOMEM; 107 area->area = get_vm_area(PAGE_SIZE * nr_frames, VM_IOREMAP); 108 if (!area->area) 109 goto out_free_ptes; 110 if (apply_to_page_range(&init_mm, (unsigned long)area->area->addr, 111 PAGE_SIZE * nr_frames, gnttab_apply, &area->ptes)) ^^^^^^^^^^^ This increments area->ptes. In the original code, there was a stack variable which was changed and the area->ptes pointer wasn't modified. 112 goto out_free_vm_area; 113 return 0; 114 out_free_vm_area: 115 free_vm_area(area->area); 116 out_free_ptes: 117 kfree(area->ptes); ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This frees a different pointer from what was allocated. 118 return -ENOMEM; 119 } regards, dan carpenter
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |