[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH RFC 3/4] mm/page_alloc: always move pages to the tail of the freelist in unset_migratetype_isolate()
On 9/25/20 10:05 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> static inline void del_page_from_free_list(struct page *page, struct zone >>>> *zone, >>>> unsigned int order) >>>> { >>>> @@ -2323,7 +2332,7 @@ static inline struct page >>>> *__rmqueue_cma_fallback(struct zone *zone, >>>> */ >>>> static int move_freepages(struct zone *zone, >>>> struct page *start_page, struct page *end_page, >>>> - int migratetype, int *num_movable) >>>> + int migratetype, int *num_movable, bool to_tail) >>>> { >>>> struct page *page; >>>> unsigned int order; >>>> @@ -2354,7 +2363,10 @@ static int move_freepages(struct zone *zone, >>>> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_zone(page) != zone, page); >>>> >>>> order = page_order(page); >>>> - move_to_free_list(page, zone, order, migratetype); >>>> + if (to_tail) >>>> + move_to_free_list_tail(page, zone, order, migratetype); >>>> + else >>>> + move_to_free_list(page, zone, order, migratetype); >>>> page += 1 << order; >>>> pages_moved += 1 << order; >>>> } >>>> @@ -2362,8 +2374,9 @@ static int move_freepages(struct zone *zone, >>>> return pages_moved; >>>> } >>>> >>>> -int move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, >>>> - int migratetype, int *num_movable) >>>> +static int __move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, >>>> + int migratetype, int *num_movable, >>>> + bool to_tail) >>>> { >>>> unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn; >>>> struct page *start_page, *end_page; >>>> @@ -2384,7 +2397,20 @@ int move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct >>>> page *page, >>>> return 0; >>>> >>>> return move_freepages(zone, start_page, end_page, migratetype, >>>> - num_movable); >>>> + num_movable, to_tail); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +int move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, >>>> + int migratetype, int *num_movable) >>>> +{ >>>> + return __move_freepages_block(zone, page, migratetype, num_movable, >>>> + false); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +int move_freepages_block_tail(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, >>>> + int migratetype) >>>> +{ >>>> + return __move_freepages_block(zone, page, migratetype, NULL, true); >>>> } >>> >>> Likewise, just 5 callers of move_freepages_block(), all in the files you're >>> already changing, so no need for this wrappers IMHO. > > As long as we don't want to move the implementation to the header, we'll > need it for the constant propagation to work at compile time (we don't > really have link-time optimizations). Or am I missing something? I guess move_freepages_block() is not exactly fast path, so we could do without it. > Thanks! >
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |