[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH 0/5] x86: introduce read_sregs() and elf_core_save_regs() adjustments

To: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:04:11 +0200
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:04:15 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

1: introduce read_sregs() to allow storing to memory directly
2: ELF: don't open-code read_sreg()
3: ELF: don't store function pointer in elf_core_save_regs()
4: ELF: also record FS/GS bases in elf_core_save_regs()
5: ELF: eliminate pointless local variable from elf_core_save_regs()

Jan

Follow-Ups:
- [PATCH 6/5] x86/ELF: drop unnecessary volatile from asm()-s in elf_core_save_regs()
  - From: Jan Beulich
- [PATCH 5/5] x86/ELF: eliminate pointless local variable from elf_core_save_regs()
  - From: Jan Beulich
- [PATCH 4/5] x86/ELF: also record FS/GS bases in elf_core_save_regs()
  - From: Jan Beulich
- [PATCH 3/5] x86/ELF: don't store function pointer in elf_core_save_regs()
  - From: Jan Beulich
- [PATCH 2/5] x86/ELF: don't open-code read_sreg()
  - From: Jan Beulich
- [PATCH 1/5] x86: introduce read_sregs() to allow storing to memory directly
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: [xen-4.14-testing test] 154698: regressions - trouble: fail/pass/preparing
Next by Date: [PATCH 1/5] x86: introduce read_sregs() to allow storing to memory directly
Previous by thread: [xen-4.14-testing test] 154698: regressions - trouble: fail/pass/preparing
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/5] x86: introduce read_sregs() to allow storing to memory directly
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.