[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: remove alloc_vm_area v2
- To: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:37:41 +0200
- Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>, Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@xxxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:37:48 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 01:13:38PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> I think we have a gap that after splitting the drm-intel-next pull requests
> into
> two the drm-intel/for-linux-next branch is now missing material from
> drm-intel/drm-intel-gt-next.
>
> I think a simple course of action might be to start including
> drm-intel-gt-next
> in linux-next, which would mean that we should update DIM tooling to add
> extra branch "drm-intel/gt-for-linux-next" or so.
>
> Which specific patches are missing in this case?
The two dependencies required by my series not in mainline are:
drm/i915/gem: Avoid implicit vmap for highmem on x86-32
drm/i915/gem: Prevent using pgprot_writecombine() if PAT is not supported
so it has to be one or both of those.
|