[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [XEN PATCH v14 5/8] xen: Add vmware_port support
On 19.08.2020 18:51, Don Slutz wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c > @@ -504,6 +504,8 @@ int arch_sanitise_domain_config(struct > xen_domctl_createdomain *config) > > static bool emulation_flags_ok(const struct domain *d, uint32_t emflags) > { > + uint32_t all_emflags = emflags & XEN_X86_EMU_ALL; > + > #ifdef CONFIG_HVM > /* This doesn't catch !CONFIG_HVM case but it is better than nothing */ > BUILD_BUG_ON(X86_EMU_ALL != XEN_X86_EMU_ALL); > @@ -512,14 +514,15 @@ static bool emulation_flags_ok(const struct domain *d, > uint32_t emflags) > if ( is_hvm_domain(d) ) > { > if ( is_hardware_domain(d) && > - emflags != (X86_EMU_VPCI | X86_EMU_LAPIC | X86_EMU_IOAPIC) ) > + all_emflags != (X86_EMU_VPCI | X86_EMU_LAPIC | X86_EMU_IOAPIC) ) > return false; > if ( !is_hardware_domain(d) && > - emflags != (X86_EMU_ALL & ~X86_EMU_VPCI) && > - emflags != X86_EMU_LAPIC ) > + all_emflags != (X86_EMU_ALL & ~X86_EMU_VPCI) && > + all_emflags != X86_EMU_LAPIC ) > return false; > } > - else if ( emflags != 0 && emflags != X86_EMU_PIT ) > + else if ( emflags & XEN_X86_EMU_VMWARE_PORT || > + (all_emflags != 0 && all_emflags != X86_EMU_PIT) ) > { > /* PV or classic PVH. */ > return false; > @@ -581,7 +584,7 @@ int arch_domain_create(struct domain *d, > if ( is_hardware_domain(d) && is_pv_domain(d) ) > emflags |= XEN_X86_EMU_PIT; > > - if ( emflags & ~XEN_X86_EMU_ALL ) > + if ( emflags & ~(XEN_X86_EMU_ALL | XEN_X86_EMU_VMWARE_PORT) ) > { > printk(XENLOG_G_ERR "d%d: Invalid emulation bitmap: %#x\n", > d->domain_id, emflags); Seeing code churn like this one I'm inclined to suggest this shouldn't be part of this field. Either take it from the top bits of the field you add in patch 3, or add yet another field. See how the various Viridian sub-features also didn't go here. > @@ -600,6 +603,8 @@ int arch_domain_create(struct domain *d, > if ( is_hvm_domain(d) ) > { > d->arch.hvm.vmware_hwver = config->arch.vmware_hwver; > + d->arch.hvm.is_vmware_port_enabled = > + !!(emflags & XEN_X86_EMU_VMWARE_PORT); While I expect this to move anyway, as a general remark: No need for !! when the lvalue is of type bool. But then why have the separate boolean anyway? With how you have things now, you could as well look at d->arch.emulation_flags, and with the change suggested above you'd again have another field where the information is already present. > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > @@ -697,6 +697,9 @@ int hvm_domain_initialise(struct domain *d) > if ( hvm_tsc_scaling_supported ) > d->arch.hvm.tsc_scaling_ratio = hvm_default_tsc_scaling_ratio; > > + if ( d->arch.hvm.is_vmware_port_enabled ) > + vmport_register(d); > + > rc = viridian_domain_init(d); > if ( rc ) > goto fail2; > @@ -4214,6 +4217,12 @@ static int hvm_set_param(struct domain *d, uint32_t > index, uint64_t value) > rc = xsm_hvm_param_nested(XSM_PRIV, d); > if ( rc ) > break; > + /* Prevent nestedhvm enable with vmport */ > + if ( value && d->arch.hvm.is_vmware_port_enabled ) > + { > + rc = -EOPNOTSUPP; > + break; > + } Be aware that this case block is about to disappear. > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmware/Makefile > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmware/Makefile > @@ -1 +1,2 @@ > obj-y += vmware.o > +obj-y += vmport.o Alphabetically sorted please, again. > --- /dev/null > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmware/vmport.c > @@ -0,0 +1,148 @@ > +/* > + * HVM VMPORT emulation > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2012 Verizon Corporation > + * > + * This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it > + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License Version 2 (GPLv2) > + * as published by the Free Software Foundation. > + * > + * This file is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU > + * General Public License for more details. <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. > + */ > + > +#include <xen/lib.h> > +#include <asm/hvm/hvm.h> > +#include <asm/hvm/support.h> > + > +#include "backdoor_def.h" > + > +static int vmport_ioport(int dir, uint32_t port, uint32_t bytes, uint32_t > *val) > +{ > + struct cpu_user_regs *regs = guest_cpu_user_regs(); > + > + /* > + * While VMware expects only 32-bit in, they do support using > + * other sizes and out. However they do require only the 1 port > + * and the correct value in eax. Since some of the data > + * returned in eax is smaller the 32 bits and/or you only need > + * the other registers the dir and bytes do not need any > + * checking. The caller will handle the bytes, and dir is > + * handled below for eax. > + */ > + if ( port == BDOOR_PORT && regs->eax == BDOOR_MAGIC ) > + { > + uint32_t new_eax = ~0u; > + uint64_t value; > + struct vcpu *curr = current; > + struct domain *currd = curr->domain; Both of these ought to be possible to gain const. > + /* > + * VMware changes the other (non eax) registers ignoring dir > + * (IN vs OUT). It also changes only the 32-bit part > + * leaving the high 32-bits unchanged, unlike what one would > + * expect to happen. > + */ > + switch ( regs->ecx & 0xffff ) > + { > + case BDOOR_CMD_GETMHZ: > + new_eax = currd->arch.tsc_khz / 1000; > + break; > + > + case BDOOR_CMD_GETVERSION: > + /* MAGIC */ > + regs->ebx = BDOOR_MAGIC; I don't think the comment is of much use here. > + /* VERSION_MAGIC */ > + new_eax = 6; Didn't the earlier patch talk about version 7? > + /* Claim we are an ESX. VMX_TYPE_SCALABLE_SERVER */ > + regs->ecx = 2; > + break; > + > + case BDOOR_CMD_GETHWVERSION: > + /* vmware_hw */ > + new_eax = currd->arch.hvm.vmware_hwver; > + /* > + * Returning zero is not the best. VMware was not at > + * all consistent in the handling of this command until > + * VMware hardware version 4. So it is better to claim > + * 4 then 0. This should only happen in strange configs. > + */ > + if ( !new_eax ) > + new_eax = 4; Doesn't ->arch.hvm.vmware_hwver == 0 mean "VMware emulation disabled"? Or are the two setting indeed meant to be entirely independent? > + break; > + > + case BDOOR_CMD_GETHZ: > + { > + struct segment_register sreg; > + > + hvm_get_segment_register(curr, x86_seg_ss, &sreg); > + if ( sreg.dpl == 0 ) Do you perhaps mean hvm_get_cpl() here? > + { > + value = currd->arch.tsc_khz * 1000; No matter that value is uint64_t, you'll only ever get a 32-bit value calculated here unless you e.g. use 1000UL. > + /* apic-frequency (bus speed) */ > + regs->ecx = 1000000000ULL / APIC_BUS_CYCLE_NS; > + /* High part of tsc-frequency */ > + regs->ebx = value >> 32; > + /* Low part of tsc-frequency */ > + new_eax = value; > + } > + break; > + > + } > + case BDOOR_CMD_GETTIME: > + value = get_localtime_us(currd) - > + currd->time_offset.seconds * 1000000ULL; Whereas I don't see the need for the ULL here - seconds is a 64-bit type already, and you'll wrongly convert from signed to unsigned. > + /* hostUsecs */ > + regs->ebx = value % 1000000UL; > + /* hostSecs */ > + new_eax = value / 1000000ULL; Why once UL and once ULL? Neither of the suffixes seems necessary, but at the very least you want to be consistent (unless there's a reason not to be). (This, the previous, and the next comment apply again further down.) > + /* maxTimeLag */ > + regs->ecx = 1000000; And this value is coming from where? If it can't be calculated, please have the comment say how it was determined. > + /* offset to GMT in minutes */ > + regs->edx = currd->time_offset.seconds / 60; > + break; > + > + case BDOOR_CMD_GETTIMEFULL: > + /* BDOOR_MAGIC */ > + new_eax = BDOOR_MAGIC; Again, the comment isn't very helpful. > + value = get_localtime_us(currd) - > + currd->time_offset.seconds * 1000000ULL; > + /* hostUsecs */ > + regs->ebx = value % 1000000UL; > + /* hostSecs low 32 bits */ > + regs->edx = value / 1000000ULL; > + /* hostSecs high 32 bits */ > + regs->esi = (value / 1000000ULL) >> 32; > + /* maxTimeLag */ > + regs->ecx = 1000000; > + break; > + > + default: > + /* Let backing DM handle */ > + return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE; If so here, why not also ... > + } > + if ( dir == IOREQ_READ ) > + *val = new_eax; > + } > + else if ( dir == IOREQ_READ ) > + *val = ~0u; ... here? > --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/domain.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/domain.h > @@ -162,6 +162,9 @@ struct hvm_domain { > spinlock_t uc_lock; > bool_t is_in_uc_mode; > > + /* VMware backdoor port available */ > + bool_t is_vmware_port_enabled; While as per above I assume this will go away again, as a general remark: "bool" please in new additions, or even when just touching existing lines. Jan
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |