RE: [PATCH v9 4/8] docs/specs: add missing definitions to libxc-migration-stream

["Durrant, Paul" <pdurrant@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 02 October 2020 23:42
> To: Paul Durrant <paul@xxxxxxx>; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Durrant, Paul <pdurrant@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; George Dunlap 
> <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>; Ian Jackson
> <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>; Julien Grall 
> <julien@xxxxxxx>; Stefano
> Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>; Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v9 4/8] docs/specs: add missing definitions to 
> libxc-migration-stream
> 
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click 
> links or open
> attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
> 
> 
> 
> On 24/09/2020 14:10, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > From: Paul Durrant <pdurrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The STATIC_DATA_END, X86_CPUID_POLICY and X86_MSR_POLICY record types have
> > sections explaining what they are but their values are not defined. Indeed
> > their values are defined as "Reserved for future mandatory records."
> >
> > Also, the spec revision is adjusted to match the migration stream version
> > and an END record is added to the description of a 'typical save record for
> > and x86 HVM guest.'
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <pdurrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Fixes: 6f71b5b1506 ("docs/migration Specify migration v3 and 
> > STATIC_DATA_END")
> > Fixes: ddd273d8863 ("docs/migration: Specify X86_{CPUID,MSR}_POLICY 
> > records")
> 
> Oops sorry.  I swear I had these at one point.  I can only presume it
> got swallowed by a rebase at some point.
> 

Can I take that as an R-b?

  Paul

> ~Andrew