[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [PATCH v9 6/8] common/domain: add a domain context record for shared_info...
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: 05 October 2020 11:40 > To: Paul Durrant <paul@xxxxxxx>; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Paul Durrant <pdurrant@xxxxxxxxxx>; Ian Jackson > <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>; > George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>; > Julien Grall > <julien@xxxxxxx>; Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 6/8] common/domain: add a domain context record for > shared_info... > > On 24/09/2020 14:10, Paul Durrant wrote: > > diff --git a/tools/misc/xen-domctx.c b/tools/misc/xen-domctx.c > > index 243325dfce..6ead7ea89d 100644 > > --- a/tools/misc/xen-domctx.c > > +++ b/tools/misc/xen-domctx.c > > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ > > #include <errno.h> > > > > #include <xenctrl.h> > > +#include <xen-tools/libs.h> > > #include <xen/xen.h> > > #include <xen/domctl.h> > > #include <xen/save.h> > > @@ -61,6 +62,82 @@ static void dump_header(void) > > > > } > > > > +static void print_binary(const char *prefix, const void *val, size_t size, > > + const char *suffix) > > +{ > > + printf("%s", prefix); > > + > > + while ( size-- ) > > + { > > + uint8_t octet = *(const uint8_t *)val++; > > + unsigned int i; > > + > > + for ( i = 0; i < 8; i++ ) > > + { > > + printf("%u", octet & 1); > > + octet >>= 1; > > + } > > + } > > + > > + printf("%s", suffix); > > +} > > + > > +static void dump_shared_info(void) > > +{ > > + DOMAIN_SAVE_TYPE(SHARED_INFO) *s; > > + bool has_32bit_shinfo; > > + shared_info_any_t *info; > > + unsigned int i, n; > > + > > + GET_PTR(s); > > + has_32bit_shinfo = s->flags & DOMAIN_SAVE_32BIT_SHINFO; > > + > > + printf(" SHARED_INFO: has_32bit_shinfo: %s buffer_size: %u\n", > > + has_32bit_shinfo ? "true" : "false", s->buffer_size); > > + > > + info = (shared_info_any_t *)s->buffer; > > + > > +#define GET_FIELD_PTR(_f) \ > > + (has_32bit_shinfo ? \ > > + (const void *)&(info->x32._f) : \ > > + (const void *)&(info->x64._f)) > > +#define GET_FIELD_SIZE(_f) \ > > + (has_32bit_shinfo ? sizeof(info->x32._f) : sizeof(info->x64._f)) > > +#define GET_FIELD(_f) \ > > + (has_32bit_shinfo ? info->x32._f : info->x64._f) > > + > > + n = has_32bit_shinfo ? > > + ARRAY_SIZE(info->x32.evtchn_pending) : > > + ARRAY_SIZE(info->x64.evtchn_pending); > > + > > + for ( i = 0; i < n; i++ ) > > + { > > + const char *prefix = !i ? > > + " evtchn_pending: " : > > + " "; > > + > > + print_binary(prefix, GET_FIELD_PTR(evtchn_pending[0]), > > + GET_FIELD_SIZE(evtchn_pending[0]), "\n"); > > + } > > + > > + for ( i = 0; i < n; i++ ) > > + { > > + const char *prefix = !i ? > > + " evtchn_mask: " : > > + " "; > > + > > + print_binary(prefix, GET_FIELD_PTR(evtchn_mask[0]), > > + GET_FIELD_SIZE(evtchn_mask[0]), "\n"); > > + } > > What about domains using FIFO? This is meaningless for them. > Indeed, but this is essentially a debug tool so I'd rather it just dumped everything that might be useful. > > + > > + printf(" wc: version: %u sec: %u nsec: %u\n", > > + GET_FIELD(wc_version), GET_FIELD(wc_sec), GET_FIELD(wc_nsec)); > > wc_sec_hi is also a rather critical field in this calculation. > Ok. > > + > > +#undef GET_FIELD > > +#undef GET_FIELD_SIZE > > +#undef GET_FIELD_PTR > > +} > > + > > static void dump_end(void) > > { > > DOMAIN_SAVE_TYPE(END) *e; > > @@ -173,6 +250,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > > switch (desc->typecode) > > { > > case DOMAIN_SAVE_CODE(HEADER): dump_header(); break; > > + case DOMAIN_SAVE_CODE(SHARED_INFO): dump_shared_info(); break; > > case DOMAIN_SAVE_CODE(END): dump_end(); break; > > default: > > printf("Unknown type %u: skipping\n", desc->typecode); > > diff --git a/xen/common/domain.c b/xen/common/domain.c > > index 8cfa2e0b6b..6709f9c79e 100644 > > --- a/xen/common/domain.c > > +++ b/xen/common/domain.c > > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ > > #include <xen/xenoprof.h> > > #include <xen/irq.h> > > #include <xen/argo.h> > > +#include <xen/save.h> > > #include <asm/debugger.h> > > #include <asm/p2m.h> > > #include <asm/processor.h> > > @@ -1657,6 +1658,110 @@ int continue_hypercall_on_cpu( > > return 0; > > } > > > > +static int save_shared_info(const struct domain *d, struct domain_context > > *c, > > + bool dry_run) > > +{ > > + struct domain_shared_info_context ctxt = { > > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > > + .flags = has_32bit_shinfo(d) ? DOMAIN_SAVE_32BIT_SHINFO : 0, > > + .buffer_size = has_32bit_shinfo(d) ? > > + sizeof(struct compat_shared_info) : > > + sizeof(struct shared_info), > > +#else > > + .buffer_size = sizeof(struct shared_info), > > +#endif > > + }; > > + size_t hdr_size = offsetof(typeof(ctxt), buffer); > > + int rc; > > + > > + rc = DOMAIN_SAVE_BEGIN(SHARED_INFO, c, 0); > > + if ( rc ) > > + return rc; > > + > > + rc = domain_save_data(c, &ctxt, hdr_size); > > + if ( rc ) > > + return rc; > > + > > + rc = domain_save_data(c, d->shared_info, ctxt.buffer_size); > > + if ( rc ) > > + return rc; > > + > > + return domain_save_end(c); > > +} > > + > > +static int load_shared_info(struct domain *d, struct domain_context *c) > > +{ > > + struct domain_shared_info_context ctxt; > > + size_t hdr_size = offsetof(typeof(ctxt), buffer); > > + unsigned int i; > > + int rc; > > + > > + rc = DOMAIN_LOAD_BEGIN(SHARED_INFO, c, &i); > > + if ( rc ) > > + return rc; > > + > > + if ( i ) /* expect only a single instance */ > > + return -ENXIO; > > + > > + rc = domain_load_data(c, &ctxt, hdr_size); > > + if ( rc ) > > + return rc; > > + > > + if ( ctxt.buffer_size > sizeof(shared_info_t) || > > + (ctxt.flags & ~DOMAIN_SAVE_32BIT_SHINFO) ) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if ( ctxt.flags & DOMAIN_SAVE_32BIT_SHINFO ) > > + { > > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > > + has_32bit_shinfo(d) = true; > > d->arch.has_32bit_shinfo > If you'd prefer, ok. > > +#else > > + return -EINVAL; > > +#endif > > + } > > + > > + if ( is_pv_domain(d) ) > > + { > > + shared_info_t *shinfo = xmalloc(shared_info_t); > > + > > + if ( !shinfo ) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + rc = domain_load_data(c, shinfo, sizeof(*shinfo)); > > + if ( rc ) > > + goto out; > > There's no need for a memory allocation, or to double buffer this data. > You can memcpy() straight out of the context record. > That would mean re-working the way that domain_load_data() works. I'd really rather not. > > + > > + memcpy(&shared_info(d, vcpu_info), &__shared_info(d, shinfo, > > vcpu_info), > > + sizeof(shared_info(d, vcpu_info))); > > + memcpy(&shared_info(d, arch), &__shared_info(d, shinfo, arch), > > + sizeof(shared_info(d, arch))); > > + > > + memset(&shared_info(d, evtchn_pending), 0, > > + sizeof(shared_info(d, evtchn_pending))); > > + memset(&shared_info(d, evtchn_mask), 0xff, > > + sizeof(shared_info(d, evtchn_mask))); > > + > > + shared_info(d, arch.pfn_to_mfn_frame_list_list) = 0; > > + for ( i = 0; i < XEN_LEGACY_MAX_VCPUS; i++ ) > > + shared_info(d, vcpu_info[i].evtchn_pending_sel) = 0; > > What is the plan for transparent migrate here? While this is ok for > regular migrate, its definitely not for transparent. > Quite true, as evidenced that this is inside 'if ( is_pv_domain(d) )'. It is not yet clear how much of the shared info we need for transparent migrate. It may be nothing. > > + > > + rc = domain_load_end(c, false); > > + > > + out: > > + xfree(shinfo); > > + } > > + else > > + /* > > + * No modifications to shared_info are required for restoring > > non-PV > > + * domains. > > + */ > > + rc = domain_load_end(c, true); > > + > > + return rc; > > +} > > + > > +DOMAIN_REGISTER_SAVE_LOAD(SHARED_INFO, save_shared_info, load_shared_info); > > + > > /* > > * Local variables: > > * mode: C > > diff --git a/xen/include/public/save.h b/xen/include/public/save.h > > index 551dbbddb8..0e855a4b97 100644 > > --- a/xen/include/public/save.h > > +++ b/xen/include/public/save.h > > @@ -82,7 +82,18 @@ struct domain_save_header { > > }; > > DECLARE_DOMAIN_SAVE_TYPE(HEADER, 1, struct domain_save_header); > > > > -#define DOMAIN_SAVE_CODE_MAX 1 > > +struct domain_shared_info_context { > > + uint32_t flags; > > + > > +#define DOMAIN_SAVE_32BIT_SHINFO 0x00000001 > > + > > + uint32_t buffer_size; > > This struct is already wrapped with a header including a size which > encompasses buffer. > > Multiple overlapping size fields is an easy way to memory corruption, > because it causes ambiguity as to which one is right. > The record size currently includes padding. I'm re-working that in v10 and so this size can be dropped. Paul
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |