Re: [PATCH] x86/alternative: don't call text_poke() in lazy TLB mode

[Jürgen Groß <jgross@xxxxxxxx>]

On 12.10.20 12:13, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 04:42:25PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > When running in lazy TLB mode the currently active page tables might
> > be the ones of a previous process, e.g. when running a kernel thread.
> >
> > This can be problematic in case kernel code is being modified via
> > text_poke() in a kernel thread, and on another processor exit_mmap()
> > is active for the process which was running on the first cpu before
> > the kernel thread.
> >
> > As text_poke() is using a temporary address space and the former
> > address space (obtained via cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) is restored
> > afterwards, there is a race possible in case the cpu on which
> > exit_mmap() is running wants to make sure there are no stale
> > references to that address space on any cpu active (this e.g. is
> > required when running as a Xen PV guest, where this problem has been
> > observed and analyzed).
> >
> > In order to avoid that, drop off TLB lazy mode before switching to the
> > temporary address space.
> Oh man, that must've been 'fun' :/
Yeah.

> > Fixes: cefa929c034eb5d ("x86/mm: Introduce temporary mm structs")
> > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 9 +++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> > index cdaab30880b9..cd6be6f143e8 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> > @@ -807,6 +807,15 @@ static inline temp_mm_state_t use_temporary_mm(struct 
> > mm_struct *mm)
> >         temp_mm_state_t temp_state;
> >   
> >   	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * Make sure not to be in TLB lazy mode, as otherwise we'll end up
> > +        * with a stale address space WITHOUT being in lazy mode after
> > +        * restoring the previous mm.
> > +        */
> > +       if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.is_lazy))
> > +               leave_mm(smp_processor_id());
> > +
> >         temp_state.mm = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm);
> >         switch_mm_irqs_off(NULL, mm, current);
> Would it make sense to write it like:
>
>         this_state.mm = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.is_lazy) ?
>                         &init_mm : this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm);
>
> Possibly with that wrapped in a conveniently named helper function.
Fine with me, but I don't think it matters that much.

For each batch of text_poke() it will be hit only once, and I'm not sure
it is really a good idea to use the knowledge that leave_mm() is just a
switch to init_mm here.

In case it is still the preferred way to do it I can send an update of
the patch.


Juergen