Re: [xen-unstable test] 156050: regressions - FAIL

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

On 22.10.2020 09:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 22.10.2020 07:58, osstest service owner wrote:
>> flight 156050 xen-unstable real [real]
>> flight 156084 xen-unstable real-retest [real]
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156050/
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156084/
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which could not be run:
>>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm 12 debian-hvm-install fail 
>> REGR. vs. 156013
> 
> Continuing from my reply to the earlier flight yesterday I'm
> meanwhile even more puzzled because 4.12 and earlier have had
> pushes, i.e. the tests were successful there that have been
> failing for 4.13 and newer. It's further suspicious (to me)
> that in each case it's just one of the qemu{u,t} tests which
> fails, while its sibling is successful. This may mean a
> dependency on the particular hardware we're running on, but
> again I wouldn't be able to make a connection of such
> behavior to the commits under test.

Actually, yesterday's 4.14 and 4.13 flights speak against a
hardware dependency: Their failing vs successful qemu{u,t}
each ran on respectively the same host.

For now I'm lost; I'd appreciate others to take a look.

Jan