[PATCH] x86/pv: Drop stale comment in dom0_construct_pv()

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

This comment has been around since c/s 1372bca0615 in 2004.  It is stale, as
it predates the introduction of struct vcpu.

It is not obvious that it was even correct at the time.  Where a vcpu (domain
at the time) has been configured to run is unrelated to construct the domain's
initial pagetables, etc.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>

Almost...  I'm not entirely sure NUMA memory allocation is plumbed through
correctly, but even that still has nothing to do with v->processor
---
 xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c b/xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c
index d79503d6a9..f7165309a2 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c
@@ -616,7 +616,6 @@ int __init dom0_construct_pv(struct domain *d,
         v->arch.pv.event_callback_cs    = FLAT_COMPAT_KERNEL_CS;
     }
 
-    /* WARNING: The new domain must have its 'processor' field filled in! */
     if ( !is_pv_32bit_domain(d) )
     {
         maddr_to_page(mpt_alloc)->u.inuse.type_info = PGT_l4_page_table;
-- 
2.11.0