Re: preparations for 4.14.1

[Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>]

On 04/11/2020 10:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
> All,
Hi Jan,


> the release is due in a couple of weeks time. Please point out
> backports you find missing from the respective staging branch,
> but which you consider relevant. (Ian: Please double check
> there are indeed no tools side backports needed here.)
Would it be possible to consider the backport mentioned [1]? For 
convenience, this is:
d25cc3ec93eb "libxl: workaround gcc 10.2 maybe-uninitialized warning"

In addition, I would like to request a backport for:

fff1b7f50e75 "libxl: fix -Werror=stringop-truncation in
libxl__prepare_sockaddr_un"

Both patches are necessary to get Xen building with newer GCC.

> Julien, Stefano, on the Arm side I'd like to ask for
>
> 5d45ecabe3c0 xen/arm64: force gcc 10+ to always inline generic atomics helpers
>
> just like I did when sending the respective 4.13.2 / 4.12.4
> mail. Is there a particular reason it wasn't put in?
>
> Jan
Cheers,

[1] <54fcf6ea-f400-c96a-cde6-4f55f909c2d6@xxxxxxx>

--
Julien Grall