[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] x86/xen: fix warning when running with nosmt mitigations
On 11/5/20 7:47 PM, Brian Masney wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 07:35:29PM -0500, Brian Masney wrote: >> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c >> index 799f4eba0a62..4a052459a08e 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c >> @@ -93,9 +93,24 @@ void xen_init_lock_cpu(int cpu) >> >> void xen_uninit_lock_cpu(int cpu) >> { >> + int irq; >> + >> if (!xen_pvspin) >> return; >> >> + /* >> + * When booting the kernel with 'mitigations=auto,nosmt', the secondary >> + * CPUs are not activated and only the primary thread on each CPU core >> + * is used. In this situation, xen_hvm_smp_prepare_cpus(), and more >> + * importantly xen_init_lock_cpu(), is not called, so the >> + * lock_kicker_irq is not initialized for the secondary CPUs. Let's >> + * exit early if the irq is not set to avoid a warning in the console >> + * log. >> + */ >> + irq = per_cpu(lock_kicker_irq, cpu); >> + if (irq == -1) >> + return; >> + >> unbind_from_irqhandler(per_cpu(lock_kicker_irq, cpu), NULL); > As soon as I saw this on lore, I saw that I should have passed the irq > variable to unbind_from_irqhandler() rather than doing another per_cpu() > lookup. I'll wait for feedback about the general approach before posting > a v2. This looks good. I'd shorten the comment though: your commit message already describes the scenario. And change the subject to something like "Don't unbind uninitialized lock_kicker_irq". -boris
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |