[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS tag for cleanup robot
- To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 06:46:46 -0800
- Authentication-results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=trix@xxxxxxxxxx
- Cc: joe@xxxxxxxxxxx, clang-built-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hyperv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tboot-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devel@xxxxxxxxxx, amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ibm-acpi-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fbdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ecryptfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, keyrings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, coreteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-bluetooth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, patches@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 14:47:15 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 11/21/20 7:23 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 08:50:58AM -0800, trix@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> The fixer review is
>> https://reviews.llvm.org/D91789
>>
>> A run over allyesconfig for x86_64 finds 62 issues, 5 are false positives.
>> The false positives are caused by macros passed to other macros and by
>> some macro expansions that did not have an extra semicolon.
>>
>> This cleans up about 1,000 of the current 10,000 -Wextra-semi-stmt
>> warnings in linux-next.
> Are any of them not false-positives? It's all very well to enable
> stricter warnings, but if they don't fix any bugs, they're just churn.
>
While enabling additional warnings may be a side effect of this effort
the primary goal is to set up a cleaning robot. After that a refactoring robot.
Tom
|
