[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] x86/xen: drop USERGS_SYSRET64 paravirt call
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 03:48:21PM +0100, Jürgen Groß wrote: > I wanted to avoid the additional NOPs for the bare metal case. Yeah, in that case it gets optimized to a single NOP: [ 0.176692] SMP alternatives: ffffffff81a00068: [0:5) optimized NOPs: 0f 1f 44 00 00 which is nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1) and I don't think that's noticeable on modern CPUs where a NOP is basically a rIP increment only and that goes down the pipe almost for free. :-) > If you don't mind them I can do as you are suggesting. Yes pls, I think asm readability is more important than a 5-byte NOP. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |